Methods for rapid identification and/or characterization of a microbial agent in a sample

ABSTRACT

A method of testing a specimen sample contained within a sealed specimen container. A test sample is removed from the specimen container with a disposable sampling device. Non-microbial agent components of the test sample are lysed, thereby producing a lysed sample. The lysed sample is delivered to a disposable separation device. A microbial agent present in test sample is concentrated within the disposable separation device. The concentrated microbial agent is interrogated, e.g., spectroscopically.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 61/216,339 filed May 15, 2009, the content of which is incorporated by reference herein.

This application is also related to the following US patent applications, the content of which is incorporated by reference herein:

U.S. Ser. No. 12/589,929, entitled “Methods for the isolation and identification of microorganisms”, filed Oct. 30, 2009.

U.S. Ser. No. 12/589,969, entitled “Separation device for use in the separation, identification and/or characterization of microorganisms”, filed Oct. 30, 2009.

U.S. Ser. No. 12/589,952, entitled “Method for separation, identification and/or characterization of microorganisms using spectroscopy”, filed Oct. 30, 2009.

U.S. Ser. No. 12/589,936, entitled “Method for separation, identification and/or characterization of microorganisms using mass spectrometry”, filed Oct. 30, 2009.

U.S. Ser. No. 12/589,985, entitled “Method for separation and characterization of microorganisms using identifier agents”, filed Oct. 30, 2009.

U.S. Ser. No. 12/589,968, entitled “Method for detection, identification and/or characterization of microorganisms in a sealed container”, filed Oct. 30, 2009.

U.S. Ser. No. 12/589,976, entitled “Method for separation, identification and/or characterization of microorganisms using Raman spectroscopy”, filed Oct. 30, 2009.

This application is also related to the following applications filed on the same date as this application, the content of which is incorporated by reference herein:

Docket no. 01121, Ser. No. ______ “Automated microbial detection apparatus.”

Docket no. 01149, Ser. No. ______, “System and method for automatically venting and sampling a culture specimen container”.

Docket no. 09-271-US, Ser. No. ______, “Combined detection instrument for culture specimen containers and instrument for identification and/or characterization of a microbial agent in a sample.”

Docket no. 09-271-B, Ser. No. ______, “System for rapid identification and/or characterization of a microbial agent in a sample.”

STATEMENT OF FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH

Not applicable.

BACKGROUND

This invention solves a long-felt need in the art for an automated instrument and method for rapidly characterizing and/or identifying a microbial agent in a sample, such as blood or other biological sample, stored in a specimen container. As an example, the instrument and methods of this disclosure provides information as to Gram type (positive or negative), morphology, species or other relevant clinical information of the microbial agent rapidly and automatically.

Instruments currently exist on the market in the U.S. that detect the growth and therefore the presence of a microorganism in a blood sample. One such instrument is the BacT/ALERT 3D instrument of the present assignee bioMérieux, Inc. The instrument receives a blood culture bottle containing a blood sample, e.g., from a human patient. The instrument incubates the bottle. Periodically during incubation an optical detection unit in the incubator analyzes a colorimetric sensor incorporated into the bottle to detect whether microbial growth has occurred within the bottle. The optical detection unit, specimen containers and sensors are described in the patent literature, see U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,945,060; 5,094,955; 5,162,229; 5,164,796; 5,217,876; 5,795,773; and 5,856,175, the entire content of each of which is incorporated by reference herein. Other prior art of interest relating generally to the detection of microorganisms in a biological sample includes the following patents: U.S. Pat. No. 5,770,394, U.S. Pat. No. 5,518,923; U.S. Pat. No. 5,498,543, U.S. Pat. No. 5,432,061, U.S. Pat. No. 5,371,016, U.S. Pat. No. 5,397,709, U.S. Pat. No. 5,344,417, U.S. Pat. No. 5,374,264, U.S. Pat. No. 6,709,857; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,211,430.

In detection instruments such as the BacT/ALERT 3D and similar instruments, once the blood culture bottle has been tested positive for microorganism presence, it is difficult to obtain a high level of characterization of the microbial agent, or identification of the species of the microbial agent, due to the interference of blood components and artifacts of the disposable system (e.g., bottle) containing the sample. Therefore, current methods use a bottle or other suitable disposable container and a related instrument for natural growth and detection of a microorganism in the sample, as described above. Once the instrument indicates that the bottle is positive for presence of a microbial agent, according to current methods the “positive” bottle is manually retrieved from the instrument and a portion of the sample is manually removed from the bottle and cultured on an agar plate. There are instruments in the art that automate the streaking of a sample medium on a culture plate and incubating the plate. One such instrument is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,617,146. After streaking, the plate is manually placed in an incubator and periodically inspected for growth of a subculture of the microorganism. After the subculture has grown sufficiently, a sample of the culture is taken from the plate and placed in a test tube. The test tube is then introduced into yet another instrument for identification testing via a disposable test sample card having a multitude of individual wells. The disposable test cards are known in the patent literature, see e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,118,280, 3,963,355, 4,018,65; 4,116,775 and 4,038,151, 5,609,828, 5,746,980, 5,766,553, 5,843,380, 5,869,005, 5,916,812, 5,932,177, 5,951,952, and 6,045,758, the entire content of which is incorporated by reference herein.

The test sample card is then processed in an analytical instrument known in the art as the VITEK 2 instrument of the assignee. The VITEK 2 instrument incubates and periodically reads the wells of the test sample card with a reader unit. Growth of the sample in one or more of the wells of the cards results in identification of the microbial agent. The VITEK 2 instrument is described in the patent literature, see e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,762,873 and 6,086,824, the content of which is incorporated by reference herein.

This entire process from the time of introducing the sample into the blood collection bottle to culture, detection of microorganism presence, and then identification of the microorganism by the VITEK 2 instrument typically takes 2-5 days. The identification steps alone, occurring after positive bottle detection, typically occupy 1-3 of these days.

Substantial, and potentially life saving, clinical benefits for a patient are possible if the time it takes for detection and identification of a microbial agent in a blood sample and reporting the results to a clinician could be reduced from the current 2-5 days to less than one day. A system that meets this need has heretofore eluded the art. However, such rapid identification and/or characterization of a microbial agent in a biological sample such as a blood sample is made possible by this invention.

The system and methods for rapidly identifying and/or characterizing a microbial agent set forth herein can be advantageously combined with an automated detection instrument for detecting the presence of an agent in the specimen container, as described in our prior provisional application and in co-pending application Ser. No ______, attorney docket no. 09-271-US, filed on the same date as this application, and in embodiments disclosed herein. In this combination, the inventive system and methods combine a detection instrument operative to detect a container containing a blood or other sample as being positive for microbial agent presence, and rapid and automated identification of the agent. In one embodiment, the detection instrument may be coupled to or integrated with an automated identification and/or characterization instrument as described herein performing additional steps necessary for identification and/or characterization of a microbial agent at the time of detection. The resulting combined system presents a unique automated solution for rapid identification and/or characterization at the time of detection, providing a complete system solution. The total time from first loading a biological sample into a detection container (e.g., bottle) to identification and/or characterization is typically less than 24 hours in most cases. Moreover, instead of it taking one to three additional days to obtain the identification and/or characterization of the microbial agent after a bottle is tested positive, as in the prior art, such results can potentially be obtained in less than one hour with the present inventive system and methods. The instrument of this disclosure also provides the ability to provide a rapid and automated identification and/or characterization result at any time of the day or night.

The systems and methods of this disclosure have other incidental benefits and features, including the potential to: (a) reduce exposure of lab personnel to sharps and biohazard materials; (b) reduce laboratory labor and user errors; (c) improve sample tracking, traceability and information management; (d) interface to laboratory automation systems; (e) improve workflow and ergonomics; (f) improve patient care by delivering clinically relevant actionable information; and (g) provide faster results thereby potentially decreasing costs by focusing earlier on appropriate antimicrobial therapy and reducing hospital stay.

The methods of this disclosure can be implemented in an automated identification instrument that functions as a stand-alone instrument. Optionally, the instrument can include systems and components for automated detection of whether a specimen container is positive for the presence of a microbial agent and if so then proceed to process the bottle to automatically and rapidly identify and/or characterize the microbial agent.

Many further advantages and benefits over the prior art will be explained below in the following detailed description.

SUMMARY

Methods are described below for automated identification and/or characterization of a microbial agent present in a sample contained in a specimen container, e.g., bottle. Preferred embodiments accomplish identification and/or characterization in a fully automated manner, i.e., without direct human involvement in the processing steps. The invention will be described below in the context of a system and method for processing blood culture specimen containers and identifying and/or characterizing a microbial agent present in blood, however the system and methods are applicable to other types of biological or other samples.

In one aspect, a method of testing a specimen sample contained within a sealed specimen container is disclosed. The method includes the steps of: a) removing a test sample from the specimen container with a disposable sampling device and containing the test sample in the disposable sampling device; b) lysing non-microbial agent components of the test sample within the disposable sampling device, thereby producing a lysed sample; c) delivering the lysed sample to a disposable separation device; d) concentrating a microbial agent present in the portion of the sample within the disposable separation device; and e) interrogating the concentrated microbial agent within the disposable separation device.

In some embodiments described herein, the interrogation may include the features of U.S. Ser. No. 12/589,929, entitled “Methods for the isolation and identification of microorganisms”, filed Oct. 30, 2009; U.S. Ser. No. 12/589,969; entitled “Separation device for use in the separation, identification and/or characterization of microorganisms”, filed Oct. 30, 2009; U.S. Ser. No. 12/589,952, entitled “Method for separation, identification and/or characterization of microorganisms using spectroscopy”, filed Oct. 30, 2009; U.S. Ser. No. 12/589,936, entitled “Method for separation, identification and/or characterization of microorganisms using mass spectrometry”, filed Oct. 30, 2009; U.S. Ser. No. 12/589,985, entitled “Method for separation and characterization of microorganisms using identifier agents”, filed Oct. 30, 2009; U.S. Ser. No. 12/589,968, entitled “Method for detection, identification and/or characterization of microorganisms in a sealed container”, filed Oct. 30, 2009 and U.S. Ser. No. 12/589,976, entitled “Method for separation, identification and/or characterization of microorganisms using raman spectroscopy”, filed Oct. 30, 2009, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein. A variety of optical technologies are envisioned for use in the interrogation step, including spectroscopic measurements of intrinsic fluorescence from the concentrated microbial agent, Raman spectroscopy, or other optical technique capable of characterizing and/or identifying a microorganism based on its chemical or physical make-up. In other embodiments, the method may involve a step of removing all or a portion of the concentrated microbial agent from the separation device and analyzing the concentrated microbial agent directly, e.g., via a mass spectrometer, or via another disposable testing device (e.g., test strip or test card).

In another aspect, a method is described for rapid identification and/or characterization of an unknown microbial agent present in a specimen sample. The method include steps of: a) automatically with robotic apparatus placing the sample within a disposable separation device; b) centrifuging the disposable separation device thereby separating and concentrating the microbial agent within the disposable separation device; c) spectroscopically interrogating the microbial agent to obtain spectroscopic measurements of the concentrated microbial agent; d) comparing the spectroscopic measurements with reference data comprising spectroscopic measurements of concentrated, known microbial agents, and e) identifying and/or characterizing the unknown microbial agent from the comparing step.

The steps of the inventive methods may be performed multiple times on the same specimen container, e.g., periodically every thirty minutes. Additionally, the steps could be performed periodically while the specimen container is subject to incubation. This method could provide early identification prior to positive declaration by an associated detection instrument. The methods could take advantage of complimentary clinical information that is predictive of a positive culture such as sepsis markers, clinical presentation, etc., in order to by-pass a separate detection step and proceed directly to incubation of the specimen container and repeating the steps for identification and/or characterization while microbial growth occurs in the specimen container.

In one embodiment, the sample can be a biological sample, e.g. biological fluid. The biological sample can be a clinical or non-clinical sample. In another embodiment, the biological sample comprises a blood sample and the method further comprises the step of lysing blood components present in the withdrawn test sample. The lysing step can be done in the separation device or in a disposable sampling device used to extract the sample from the specimen container, or in another vessel or device.

In applications where a lysis of non-microbial agent cellular components of the sample is desirable, a particular selective lytic buffer (“lytic agent”) may not be optimal for all organisms expected to be encountered in the sample. In this case where a positive sample does not yield an identification or characterization result due to a non-optimal lysis and/or separation process, the system can be configured to automatically re-process the sample using an alternative lytic buffer formula. Information on the growth rates measured in an associated detection instrument could be used to select the most optimal lysis buffer formula for re-processing. Upon re-processing, it is expected that a true positive will yield a result. Otherwise, the sample is considered to be a false positive determination from the detection subsystem. Accordingly, in one configuration of the instrument several containers of different lysis buffers are included in the instrument implementing the methods and a selected lysis buffer is obtained, e.g., loaded into a sampling device used to withdraw a test sample from the specimen container.

In yet another aspect, a method is disclosed for concentrating a microbial agent present in a sample. The sample is loaded into a specimen container. The method includes the steps of (a) automatically withdrawing a portion of the sample from the specimen container into a disposable sampling device; (b) automatically introducing the portion of the sample from the disposable sampling device into a disposable separation device, the separation device loaded with a density cushion; and (c) automatically centrifuging the disposable separation device to thereby separate and concentrate the microbial agent within the separation device.

The method may optionally further include the step of lysing cellular components present in the sample prior to performing the automatic centrifuging step (c). In one configuration, the lysing step is performed within the disposable sampling device. The lysing step comprises the step of mixing the sample with a selective lytic buffer within the sampling device. In another optional configuration, the method includes the steps of 1) automatically adding a selective lytic buffer into the disposable sampling device; 2) automatically withdrawing a portion of the sample from the specimen container into the disposable sampling device containing the selective lytic buffer, and 3) mixing the selective lytic buffer with the sample within the disposable sampling device.

In yet another aspect, a method of identifying and/or characterizing a microbial agent in a sample is disclosed comprising the steps of: a) obtaining reference data comprising intrinsic fluorescence measurements from concentrations of a multitude of known microbial agents; b) storing the reference data in a machine readable memory accessible to an automated identification and/or characterization instrument; and c) providing in the instrument (1) a robotic, automated apparatus concentrating a sample containing an unknown microbial agent within a disposable device, (2) a reading unit capable of obtaining intrinsic fluorescence measurements from the concentrated microbial agent in the disposable device, and (3) a processing unit executing instructions comparing the intrinsic fluorescence measurements obtained from the sample with the reference data and automatically identifying and/or characterizing the unknown microbial agent in the sample.

These and many more aspects and features of the identification instrument will be discussed below in conjunction with the appended drawing figures.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The following detailed description makes reference to the appended drawing figures. It is intended that the embodiments and figures disclosed herein are to be considered illustrative and offered by way of example rather than restrictive.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an automated instrument for rapid identification and/or characterization of a microbial agent present in a sample.

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of one possible configuration of the instrument shown in FIG. 1. The instrument includes a rack for holding specimen containers, a cassette of disposables (including sampling devices and separation devices), a robotic transfer mechanism, sample removal apparatus, a separation and concentration device in the form of a centrifuge, and a identification and/or characterization module (read station) operating to interrogate a separation device containing a concentrated microbial agent for identification and/or characterization of the microbial agent. In one possible embodiment, the instrument of FIG. 2 could be integrated with an automated detection instrument (See FIG. 28, 47-48 below), in which case the rack for the specimen containers is the same structure holding the specimen containers during the detection operations. Alternatively, the identification and/or characterization instrument is located remotely from but coupled to an automated detection instrument as shown in FIG. 47 and described in our prior provisional application and co-pending US application Ser. No. ______, attorney docket no. 09-271-US, filed on the same date as this application.

FIG. 3 is top plan view of the identification and/or characterization instrument of FIG. 2, showing the rack of positive specimen containers in one position for incubation.

FIG. 4 is a top plan view of the instrument of FIG. 2, showing the rack for the positive specimen containers moved to a position for withdrawal of the sample from the bottle for identification and/or characterization testing.

FIG. 5 is another perspective view of the embodiment of FIGS. 2-4.

FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a separation device which is used in conjunction with the identification/characterization instrument of FIG. 1. The separation device receives a portion of the sample from a positive specimen container. The microbial agent is concentrated at the bottom of a capillary tube located in the separation device in the manner described herein. The concentrated microbial agent is then interrogated by a identification and/or characterization reading module to characterize and/or identify the microbial agent.

FIG. 7 is a perspective view of the separation device of FIG. 6.

FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view of the separation device of FIGS. 6 and 7.

FIG. 9 is a cross-sectional view of an end-cap which is fitted to the lower end of the separation device of FIGS. 6-8.

FIG. 10 is a cross-sectional view of the separation device of FIG. 6, showing the concentrated microbial agent in the capillary tube of the separation device after centrifugation.

FIG. 11 is a schematic illustration of the concentrated microbial agent in the separation device of FIG. 6 being interrogated by the identification/characterization or reading module.

FIG. 12 is a perspective view of an alternative embodiment of the separation device of FIG. 6.

FIG. 13 is a cross-section of the separation device of FIG. 12.

FIG. 14 is an illustration of one embodiment of a disposable sampling device which is used within the identification and/or characterization instrument.

FIG. 15 is a detailed perspective view showing the operation of the sample removal apparatus in the identification and/or characterization instrument to pick up one of the sampling devices of FIG. 14 from a cassette of disposable devices. The cassette includes a multitude of the separation devices of FIG. 6 or 12 and a multitude of the sampling devices of FIG. 14.

FIG. 16 is a detailed perspective view showing the operation of the sample removal apparatus to sterilize the stopper at the top of the detection container and vent the detection container.

FIG. 17 is a more detailed illustration of the sample removing apparatus in the position shown in FIG. 16.

FIG. 18 is a detailed perspective view showing the operation of the sample removal apparatus to withdraw a portion of the sample within the detection container into one of the disposable sampling devices of FIG. 14.

FIG. 19 is a more detailed illustration of the sample removal apparatus in the position of FIG. 18.

FIGS. 20A-20C are three perspective views of the sample removal apparatus showing the operations of dispensing the sample into one of the separation devices and transfer the sampling device to the waste container.

FIG. 21 is sequence of perspective views of the sample removal apparatus showing the operations of transferring the separation device to the separation and concentration station and optical interrogation of the separation device in the identification and/or characterization module.

FIG. 22 is a more detailed illustration of the separation and concentration station and the identification and/or characterization module.

FIG. 23 is a sequence of three perspective views of the identification and/or characterization instrument showing the operations of picking up the separation device, transferring the separation device to the waste container and placing the separation device in the waste container.

FIG. 24 is a more detailed illustration of the operation of placing the separation device into the waste container.

FIG. 25 is a block diagram of an alternative configuration of the identification and/or characterization instrument in which the concentrated microbial agent is removed from the separation device and analyzed after removal. The analysis could be performed by any one of a number of different types of systems or units, including a molecular diagnostic test unit, a mass spectrometry unit, or a microbial identification test device and associated processing instrument.

FIGS. 26A-26C are a flow chart showing the steps performed in the operation of both automatically detecting the presence of a microbial agent in a specimen container (FIG. 26A) and automatically identifying and/or characterizing the microbial agent (FIGS. 26B and 26C).

FIG. 27 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of an instrument for rapid and automated identification and/or characterization of a microbial agent in a sample.

FIG. 28 is a perspective view of the instrument of FIG. 27, showing one possible configuration of the racks for holding the specimen containers. In the embodiment of FIG. 28, the racks include features for incubation of the specimen containers, agitation of the specimen containers, and automated detection of microbial growth within the specimen containers. Thus, FIG. 28 shows one embodiment in which the automated detection and identification instruments can be combined into a single instrument.

FIG. 29 is another perspective view of the embodiments of FIGS. 27 and 28. A multiple axis robot is used access the specimen containers and perform the sampling operation using disposable sampling devices.

FIG. 30 is a perspective view of cassettes holding disposable sampling devices and disposable separation devices, which can be used in the instruments of either FIG. 2-5 or 27-29.

FIG. 31 is a perspective view of a multiple axis robot used in the embodiment of FIG. 29.

FIG. 32 is a perspective view of an alternative embodiment of a disposable sampling device, presenting a variation on the general design shown in FIG. 14.

FIG. 33 is a cross sectional view of the sampling device of FIG. 32.

FIG. 34 is a detailed perspective view of the distal end of the arm of the robot of FIG. 31 shown gripping the sampling device of FIG. 32.

FIG. 35 is another detailed perspective view of the distal end of the arm of the robot of FIG. 31 shown gripping the sampling device of FIG. 32.

FIG. 36 is a perspective view of the pump assembly on the robot of FIG. 31 which operates to provide vacuum and positive pressure to the sampling device in order to (a) withdraw a small portion of the sample from one of the specimen containers and (b) dispense the sample (optionally after lysing the sample) into one of the disposable separation devices of FIGS. 6 and 30.

FIG. 37 is a perspective view of the robot of FIG. 31 performing a sampling operation on one of the specimen containers using the sampling device of FIG. 32.

FIG. 38 is a more detailed view of the sampling operation shown in FIG. 37.

FIG. 39 is a perspective view of the sampling device of FIG. 32 being placed into a vortexer shown in FIGS. 26 and 27 in order to facilitate lysing of cellular components in the sample withdrawn from one of the specimen containers.

FIG. 39A is a perspective view of the vortexer having an optional coil heater around the holder of the sampling device in order to heat the holder and maintain the sample within the sampling device at 37 degrees C.

FIG. 40 is a perspective view of the sampling device of FIG. 32 being held by the robot hand during the vortexing operation.

FIGS. 41A and 41B are side and cross-sectional views of the vortexer and sampling device.

FIGS. 42A and 42B are cross-sectional and perspective views of a holder for the sampling device incorporated into the vortexer.

FIGS. 43A, 43B and 43C are cross-sectional, side and perspective views, respectively, of the sampling device and the separation device prior to introduction of the sample from the sampling device into the separation device. FIG. 43D is another perspective view of the sampling and separation device, with the rubber needle sheath of the sampling device shown partially removed in order to show the needle of the sampling device.

FIG. 44 is a perspective view of the sampling device in position to inject a portion of the sample into the separation device.

FIG. 45 is a side view of the injection operation shown in FIG. 44.

FIG. 46 is a cross-section view of the sampling and separation devices showing the injection operation.

FIG. 46A is a detailed view of the cup and cup holder of FIG. 27, showing the cup receiving one of the separation devices; FIG. 46B shows a separation device being inserted into the cup of FIG. 46A; FIG. 46C is a cross-section of the cup holder, cup and separation device of FIG. 46A.

FIG. 47 is a schematic representation of a detection instrument for detection of a microbial agent in a biological sample coupled to an automated identification and/or characterization instrument via a conveyor.

FIG. 48 is a schematic representation of a combined automated detection and identification instrument which receives specimen containers in an automated fashion e.g., via a conveyor.

FIG. 49 is a schematic representation of a combined automated detection and identification instrument which receives specimen containers manually from a user, e.g., via opening a door in a front panel of the instrument. The embodiment of FIG. 49 could be implemented, for example, using the arrangement shown in FIG. 27.

FIG. 50 is schematic block diagram showing a computer system controlling the operation of the instrument of FIGS. 27-46.

FIGS. 51A-C are a flow chart showing a sequence of processing instructions which perform identification and/or characterization of the concentrated microbial agent using intrinsic fluorescence measurements.

FIGS. 52-57 are plots of intrinsic fluorescence (IF) measurements, and transforms thereof which illustrate the benefit of the pre-processing instructions of FIG. 51A in terms of minimizing strain-to-strain variations within an organism group.

FIGS. 58 and 59 are plots of first derivative of logarithm transformed IF measurements showing the discrimination potential between a subset of species for excitation wavelengths of 315 and 415 nm.

FIG. 60 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of a separation device which can be used in conjunction with the identification/characterization instrument of FIG. 1. The separation device of this embodiment has a separate lytic chamber and a separate separation chamber which are connected by a fluid flow-channel.

FIG. 61 is a perspective view of the separation device embodiment of FIG. 60, showing a top plate and base plate separated from the separation device.

FIG. 62 is a top view of the body portion of the separation device embodiment shown in FIG. 60.

FIG. 63 is a cross-sectional view along line A-A of the separation device embodiment shown in FIG. 62.

FIG. 64 is a cross-sectional view along line B-B of the separation device embodiment shown in FIG. 62.

FIG. 65 is a perspective view of a combined sampling and separation device which can be used in conjunction with the identification/characterization instrument of FIG. 1.

FIG. 66 is a front view of the combined sampling and separation device shown in FIG. 65 with a pinch valve shown in the open position.

FIG. 67 is a cross-sectional view of the combined sampling and separation device shown in FIG. 66 with the pinch valve shown in the open position.

FIG. 68 is a front view of the combined sampling and separation device shown in FIG. 65 with a pinch valve shown in the closed position.

FIG. 69 is a cross-sectional view of the combined sampling and separation device shown in FIG. 67 with the pinch valve shown in the closed position.

FIG. 70 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of a combined sampling and separation device.

FIG. 71 is a cross-sectional view of the combined sampling and separation device shown in FIG. 70.

FIG. 72 is a cross-sectional view of the valve shown in FIG. 71.

FIG. 73 is a side view of a third embodiment of a combined sampling and separation device which can be used in conjunction with the identification/characterization instrument of FIG. 1.

FIG. 74 is a cross-sectional view of the combined sampling and separation device shown in FIG. 73.

FIG. 75 is an exploded view of the combined sampling and separation device shown in FIG. 73.

FIG. 76 is a perspective view of a third embodiment of a combined sampling and separation device which can be used in conjunction with the identification/characterization instrument of FIG. 1.

FIG. 77A is a side view of the combined sampling and separation device shown in FIG. 76.

FIG. 77B is a cross-sectional view of the Combined sampling and separation device shown in FIG. 77A.

FIG. 78A is a side view of the combined sampling and separation device shown in FIG. 76.

FIG. 78B is a cross-sectional view of the combined sampling and separation device shown in FIG. 78A.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION I. Overview

An automated instrument is described herein that provides a new architecture and method for automated identification and/or characterization of a microbial agent in a specimen sample, e.g., biological sample. The identification and/or characterization instrument 104 is shown in block diagram form in FIG. 1. Two embodiments are described herein in great detail, a first embodiment described in conjunction with FIGS. 2-26 and a second embodiment described in conjunction with FIGS. 27-46. The embodiments of the instrument 104 operate on a specimen container 500 (FIG. 1) containing a sample. In one example, the specimen container 500 is a standard culture bottle, e.g., a blood culture bottle, for containing a specimen sample therein, e.g., a blood sample.

In general, any type of sample that may contain a microbial agent, e.g., bacterium, fungi or yeast species, can be tested in the instrument 104 such as for example biological samples. For example, the specimen sample can be a clinical or non-clinical sample suspected of containing one or more microbial agents. Clinical samples, such as a bodily fluid, include, but not limited to, blood, serum, plasma, blood fractions, joint fluid, urine, semen, saliva, feces, cerebrospinal fluid, gastric contents, vaginal secretions, tissue homogenates, bone marrow aspirates, bone homogenates, sputum, aspirates, swabs and swab rinsates, other body fluids, and the like. Non-clinical samples that may be tested include, but not limited to, foodstuffs, beverages, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, water (e.g., drinking water, non-potable water, and waste water), seawater ballasts, air, soil, sewage, plant material (e.g., seeds, leaves, stems, roots, flowers, fruit), blood products (e.g., platelets, serum, plasma, white blood cell fractions, etc.), donor organ or tissue samples, biowarfare samples, and the like.

One possible configuration for the instrument 104 of this disclosure is in a combined system which integrates detection of a microbial agent in a specimen container with automated identification and/or characterization of the microbial agent. Such a combined approach is described in the prior provisional application and in co-pending application Ser. No. ______, attorney docket no. 09-271-US, filed on the same date as this application. This combined approach is also described in conjunction with the embodiment of FIG. 27.

In this configuration, a specimen container 500 (FIG. 1) is inoculated with a specimen sample (e.g., clinical or non-clinical sample) and loaded/unloaded into/out of an automated detection instrument 102 (e.g. FIG. 47). After a sufficient time interval to allow natural amplification of microorganism (this time interval varies from species to species), the specimen container is tested within the detection instrument 102 for the presence of a microorganism. The testing occurs on a periodic basis so that as soon as a specimen container is tested positive it can be transferred to the identification and/or characterization instrument 104 for further analysis of the specimen sample.

Detection can be accomplished using a variety of technologies such as the colorimetric sensor described in the patent literature (see U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,945,060; 5,094,955; 5,162,229; 5,164,796; 5,217,876; 5,795,773; and 5,856,175). Detection could also be accomplished using intrinsic fluorescence of the microorganism, detection of changes in the optical scattering of the media, or detection in the generation of volatile organics in the media or headspace. These techniques are known in the art and described in previously cited patent literature in the Background section of this document.

Once a specimen container 500 is detected as positive in the automated detection instrument 102 (see FIG. 47), the detection instrument 102 will notify the operator through an indicator (e.g., visual prompt), or via a notification at the user interface display, or by other means. The system may be set up to automatically analyze a positive specimen container or require end user acknowledgement prior to sample analysis in the identification/characterization instrument 104 described below. With automatic characterization, it would be possible to notify the physician immediately via electronic means of the results from the identification/characterization system.

Once a specimen container is determined to be positive in the detection instrument 102, the positive specimen container is handed off or transferred to the identification and/or characterization instrument 104 described below. See FIG. 47. The manner in which this is accomplished can vary widely depending on the physical configuration of the detection and identification/characterization instruments 102 and 104. One example of how this can be accomplished is described below in conjunction with FIG. 27.

Referring now in particular to FIG. 1, a specimen container or bottle 500 is received in the identification and/or characterization instrument 104, either in an automated or manual fashion. The manner in which this occurs is not particularly important and can vary widely depending on the configuration of the instrument 104. The specimen container 500 is placed in a suitable holding structure or rack 1906 in the identification and/or characterization instrument 104. FIGS. 2, 5, 27 and 28 show several possible configuration for the holding structure 1906. The holding structure 1906 is typically adapted for holding a multitude of specimen containers 500. The holding structure 1906 has a facility for rotating the specimen containers to inclined positions above and below horizontal to facilitate venting and sample removal, as described below and optionally agitation of the sample and thereby promoting microbial growth. In an alternative configuration, the positively declared specimen container could remain in the racks within the detection instrument 102 and the sampling could occur directly from the detection instrument.

The identification and/or characterization instrument 104 includes a sample removal apparatus 1912 which holds or grasps a disposable sampling device 1902. Together, they operate to remove a test sample (i.e., a portion of the specimen sample in the positive specimen container 500) and subsequently add the portion to a separation device 1904 (see FIGS. 6-11). The separation device 1904 can take several forms, and one configuration is described herein in which the separation device includes a reservoir (FIG. 8, item 2602) for receiving the sample and a capillary tube 2604 connected to the reservoir 2602. The identification/characterization instrument 104 further includes a separation and/or concentration station 1916, optionally in the form of a centrifuge, which operates on the separation device 1904 so as to separate the microbial agent from other components in the test sample and concentrate the microbial agent within the separation device 1904. In one example, the microbial agent is concentrated in the form of a pellet or pellet-like mass in the bottom of the capillary tube 2604 of the separation device 1904. The identification/characterization instrument further includes a identification and/or characterization module or read station (FIG. 1, 1918) which interrogates the concentrated microbial agent to identify and/or characterize the microbial agent.

The instrument 104 receives a cassette 1900 of disposables. The disposables are of two types: (1) sampling devices 1902 for venting and removing a test sample from the specimen container 500, and (2) separation devices 1904 which receive a portion of the sample from the container 500 via the sampling device 1902 and in which the microbial agent in the test sample is concentrated. In alternative configuration of the instrument the functions of the sampling device 1902 and the separation device 1904 are combined into a single disposable device as shown in FIGS. 60-78 in which case the cassette 1900 will only include a multitude of the combined sampling and separation devices.

The instrument 104 further includes a robotic transfer mechanism 1910 which operates to access the disposables 1902 and 1904, positive specimen containers 500 held in the holder or rack 1906, a waste container 1908, the separation and concentration device 1916, and the identification module 1918. The robotic transfer mechanism 1910 may also operate to receive a positive specimen container from a separate detection instrument, and load the positive specimen container into the holding structure or rack 1906. The robotic transfer mechanism 1910 accesses the waste container, separation and concentration station 1916, identification module 1918 and other modules or components in the instrument 104 as necessary to perform the functions described below. The manner of construction of the transfer mechanism 1910 can vary widely depending on the configuration of the instrument 104.

The sample removal apparatus 1912 is preferably incorporated into, or coupled to, the robotic transfer mechanism 1910 as indicated by the dashed lines 1913. The apparatus 1912 further includes robot gripping and handling mechanisms to grasp one of the venting and sampling devices 1902, the separation device 1904 and/or the specimen container 500. The sample removal apparatus 1912 is connected to a pneumatic system 1914 which enables robotic gripping functions. The pneumatic system 1914 may include a vacuum pump, as described in the second embodiment below. The vacuum pump operates to provide vacuum to the venting and sampling device 1902 to draw a sample from the specimen container 500 and provide positive pressure to the sampling device 1902 to inject the sample from the sampling device 1902 into the separation device 1904. These aspects of the identification instrument 104 will all be described in greater detail below.

In one embodiment, the identification module 1918 includes a light source (e.g., an excitation light source) which illuminates the concentrated microbial agent in the separation device 1904. In response to the illumination, the concentrated microbial agent emits a detectable fluorescence signal, i.e., intrinsic fluorescence, as described below. In addition, the illumination of the concentrated microbial agent by the light source will generate a reflectance signal or Rayleigh scattering signal; this signal is of the same wavelength of the excitation light and provides additional information about the absorption of the microbial agent. The reflectance signal may also provide the basis of normalization of the fluorescence data The configuration of the identification module 1918 includes a means for spatially dispersing the reflectance/fluorescence spectrum, which may take the form of a spectrometer. These fluorescence and reflectance signals (spectrum) are captured by a sensor array 1920 which generates signals supplied to a computer 1924. The computer executes algorithms to process the reflectance/fluorescence signals and responsively identifies and/or characterizes the microbial agent. In one embodiment, a report containing the identification or characterization result is sent to an output device 1926 (e.g., display or associated computer workstation, pager, cell phone or e-mail server). The results can include clinical gram type, direct identification of the microbial agent (e.g., to the genus or species level in a taxonomic hierarchy), or other clinical information regarding the microbial agent in the sample.

First Embodiment FIGS. 1-26

-   -   Sample removal apparatus and sampling from the specimen         container (e.g., blood culture bottle 500) (FIGS. 1-5, 15-16,         items 1910 and 1912)

A sample removal apparatus, in the form of a sample head 1912, retrieves a sampling device 1902 (disposable) from a cassette 1900 of such devices (FIGS. 1, 5). This sampling device 1902 (FIG. 14, see also FIGS. 32, 33) may take the form of a sterile sheathed needle or other means to pierce a stopper or other closure member in the specimen container 500 and vent the specimen container (if necessary) so as to equilibrate the bottle pressure with atmospheric pressure. The sampling device (FIG. 14, 32, 1902) includes a sampling container or chamber 3204 to hold the withdrawn test sample. The test sample will include a portion of the specimen sample and any culture media present. Another possible embodiment is that the sampling device contains the sterile sheathed needle and is directly connected to or incorporated into to the separation device (i.e., a combined sampling and separation device, see FIGS. 60-78). The sample removal apparatus 1912 may optionally include features to decontaminate the surface of the bottle prior to sampling (if necessary).

The robotic transfer mechanism 1910 (FIG. 5) can be moved in three mutually orthogonal translation axes in addition to one rotational axis around one of the orthogonal translation axes so as to be able to position the sample removal apparatus 1912 opposite the access point (e.g. stopper, or septum) of each specimen container/bottle 500 while the bottle is held in the racks 2310 of the specimen container holder 1906. Alignment of a sheathed needle 3202 of the sampling device 1902 to the bottle access point can either be accomplished by a docking feature built-in to the container 500, a vision system (e.g., camera) or using pre-programmed dimensional coordinates and precision motion controlling of the robot transfer mechanism 1910. The bottle 500 is preferably first tilted upward so that the space below the access point or stopper contains the headspace gases and not liquid media. The rationale for this step is that the container should first be vented so that the pressure in the bottle is close to atmospheric pressure. This would prevent venting of aerosols from the bottle and excess fluid transfer and overfill and possible spillage in the case of a bottle over-pressure situation.

Similarly, if the culture has not produced significant by-products (e.g. headspace gases) or the microorganism is not a “gas producer”, there will be an under-pressure condition or the pressure inside the bottle will be below atmospheric pressure which would make sampling difficult. The aseptic venting will equilibrate the pressure so that a fluid sample can be removed from the bottle.

After proper venting, the bottle 500 is tilted so that the access port of the bottle is oriented downwards and a liquid sample can be transferred to the sampling device 1902. The sampling device withdraws for example a 0.5 ml, 1.0, or 2.0 ml sample of blood/media from the specimen container. Alternatively, a positive displacement syringe like device could be developed to provide sampling of specimen containers over a wide range of vacuum or pressure conditions.

Optional Lysis of Components in the Test Sample

After the test sample has been withdrawn from the specimen container 500, any cellular components contained therein (e.g., blood cells) may need to be lysed so that they do not interfere with separation and identification/characterization processes described below. The optional lysis step can be performed using a lysis buffer (which is a pH balanced surfactant solution) or can be accomplished using sonication. Both approaches cause disruption of the blood cell walls. The lysis operation can be performed by adding the lysis buffer to the disposable sampling device 1902 either off-line or within the identification and/or characterization instrument 104. Alternatively, the lysis buffer can be mixed with the blood/media sample during the loading of the sample into the separation device 1904. After the lysis buffer and blood/media sample are combined, some amount of agitation or mixing needs to be performed to ensure the lysis buffer contacts the blood cells and cell wall rupture occurs. In one possible embodiment, the robotic transfer mechanism may move up and down or otherwise to accomplish this mixing. In another embodiment, a mixing station (e.g., a vortexer as described in the second embodiment below) can be included in the instrument 104 for accomplishing this mixing.

As an alternative, the separation device 1904 could have two compartments separated by a thermoresponsive gel or other separation material that would allow the lysis buffer and the blood/media mixture to be combined, then pass through into the microorganism separation device.

Another approach could incorporate a filter to collect the microorganisms on a surface and then resuspend the microorganisms into an inoculum for testing.

It is envisioned the multiple separation devices 1904 could be provided in a format such as a cartridge, cassette, disk or strip to facilitate ease of user loading the system.

-   -   Separation and/or concentration station (FIGS. 1, 21, item 1916)         and separation device (FIG. 1, 6-11, 21, item 1904)

After withdrawal of the specimen from the specimen container, and after optional lysing of the cellular components (e.g., blood cells) in the sampling device 1902, the sample is then injected or otherwise introduced into one of the separation devices 1904. A microbial agent present in the sample is separated from other components and concentrated into a pellet or pellet-like mass within the separation device 1904.

The details of the separation and/or concentration of the microorganism in the separation device (1904) are described in related patent applications incorporated by reference into this application hereinabove, but the basic method will be described below. The separation is accomplished using a density solution or density cushion filtration. In one embodiment, the separation device 1904 is preloaded with the density cushion. Separation and concentration occurs by means of centrifugation of the separation device 1904.

The separation device 1904 (FIGS. 6-11) itself can take the form of a capillary tube design with a 1-2 mm diameter internal cross section capillary tube filled with the density solution. Above this capillary tube region is a fluted structure that opens up (i.e., opens to a larger cross sectional area) to provide a reservoir for the blood/media sample and the density solution. The bottom surface of the separation device is made of a material that has very good ultraviolet and visible light transmission. The top of the structure has a lid that is applied before centrifugation. In alternative configurations the separation device could be illuminated from the side in which case the lower portion of the separation device is made from a material that has very good ultraviolet and visible light transmission; the cross-sectional shape of the capillary tube may be circular or square.

The mixed or lysed sample contents (lysis buffer and test sample) are loaded into the separation device 1904 (see FIGS. 20A-C and the description below) by means of injecting the sample from the sampling device 1902 into the separation device 1904. The density solution is either loaded into the separation device 1904 on-line in the identification and/or characterization instrument 104 or, more preferably the separation device 1904 is shipped pre-filled with the density solution. After the mixed or lysed sample is loaded into the separation device 1904 and the device 1904 capped, the separation device 1904 is loaded into a centrifuge 1916. Alternatively, this lid is configured with a septum. The sample can be added to the device 1904 by piercing the septum, preventing the need for lid removal and replacement. The centrifuge is activated and spun, e.g. for several minutes at high rpm. This action causes the microbial agent (which is not lysed) to pass through the density solution and concentrate at the base of the capillary tube in the separation device 1904 into a pellet or pellet-like mass in the very bottom of the tube (see FIG. 10, concentrated microbial agent pellet 2804). In one embodiment, the device 1904 loaded with density cushion is centrifuged prior to loading of the test sample to remove any air bubbles or the like that may otherwise interfere with the separation and/or concentration step.

-   -   Identification/characterization module (read station) for         microbiological identification and/or characterization (FIG. 1,         21, 22 item 1918)

After the separation device 1904 has been centrifuged as described above, the centrifuge 1916 can be rotated so that the separation device 1904 is in a reading position wherein a identification and/or characterization module (read station) 1918 can interrogate the separated and/or concentrated microbial agent (FIG. 10, pellet 2804). Alternatively, the separation device 1904 can be removed from the centrifuge by the robotic transfer mechanism 1910 and placed in a read station in a separate location.

In one form, the read station 1918 includes an optical reader assembly for interrogating the concentrated microbial agent (pellet) within the separation device 1904. Since the microorganism/microbial agent in the blood/media sample is forced to the bottom surface of the capillary tube in the separation device 1904 (see FIGS. 10 and 11), the microbial agent will be in contact with the bottom surface. In one possible implementation, the optical reader assembly observes the fluorescence signal (e.g., intrinsic fluorescence signal) emitted from the concentrated microbial agent due to illumination from an excitation lights source.

The fluorescence signal (e.g., intrinsic fluorescence) results from excitation by a UV, visible spectrum or IR light source (see FIG. 11). The light sources could be continuum lamps such as a deuterium or xenon lamp for UV and/or a tungsten halogen lamp for visible/IR excitation. Since these light sources have a broad range of emission, the excitation band can be reduced using optical bandpass filters. Other methods for emission wavelength spectral width that may be utilized include an acousto-optic tunable filter, liquid crystal tunable filter, an array of optical interference filters, prism spectrograph, and still others. Alternatively, lasers are available in discrete wavelengths from the ultraviolet to the near infra-red; additionally many multiplexing methods are known to those skilled in the art,

Alternatively, light emitting diodes can be used as narrowband excitation light sources. LED's are available from a peak wavelength of 240 nm to in excess of 700 nm with a spectral width of 20-40 nm. The same methods for the reduction of spectral width can be incorporated with the LED's to improve discrimination between excitation and emission spectra.

The emission from the sample may be measured by any suitable means of spectral discrimination, most preferably employing a spectrometer. The spectrometer may be a scanning monochromator that detects specific emission wavelengths whereby the output from the monochromator is detected by a photomultiplier tube and/or the spectrometer may be configured as an imaging spectrograph whereby the output is detected by an imaging detector array such as a charge-coupled device (CCD) detector array. In one embodiment, a discriminator allows the observation of the fluorescence and/or scattering signal by a photodetection means (such as a photomultiplier tube, avalanche photodiode, CCD detector array, a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) area sensor array and/or electron multiplying charge coupled device (EMCCD) detector array (FIG. 1, item 1920). An optical lens system (2904 in FIG. 11) in front of the sensor array will magnify the 0.78-2.0 mm² area forming the bottom of the capillary tube 2604 so that it fills the frame of the sensor array. Alternatively, coupling between the disposable separation device 1902 and the optical fiber is direct optical fiber coupling with no lens system; the optical fiber probe is a six around one configuration at the distal end, with the proximal end having a linear configuration for emission fibers to couple into the entry slit of a spectrometer. Fluorescence signal strength at several different wavelengths are acquired and saved in a computer memory.

An alternative configuration is to reduce the capillary tube 2604 to less than 1 mm in diameter to account for low biomass samples. Furthermore, the geometry of the capillary area may take other shapes, such as a rectangular-shaped internal cross-section. Another optional embodiment is to configure the reading of the capillary tube from the side instead of from the bottom. There are two possible benefits to doing so: (1) avoid debris or fibers that sediment to the base of the capillary tube and (2) provide the opportunity to optically identify the presence of polymicrobic agents. A rectangular shaped capillary tube may be preferred for this side read application.

The identification and/or characterization module 1918 includes a computer (FIG. 1, item 1924) that operates on the fluorescence signal strength measurements which are stored in memory. The measurements are compared to experimentally-determined fluorescence spectra measurements for different types of microorganisms (i.e. Gram positive, Gram negative, yeast, etc.) that are also stored in memory. The computer executes a classification algorithm and generates a classification result for the microbial agent, e.g., gram classification, gram family, and species. In one configuration, further analysis of the spectra of the captured intrinsic fluorescence signal is accomplished so that species identification and/or characterization or at least the top three probabilities for species identification is achieved. Details on the methods executed by the computer for identification and/or characterization are explained below.

The identification of Gram type, gram family and species could also be accomplished using a micro-Raman evaluation. Raman spectroscopy is a non-contact technique where the sample is illuminated by laser radiation. The scattered light is either elastically or inelastically scattered by interaction with the molecules which comprise the microbial agent. The elastically scattered light is referred to as Rayleigh scattering and the inelastically scattered light is Raman scattering. Raman spectroscopy has been shown to be a potentially viable method of microorganism identification and/or characterization by examination of the vibrational spectra of the microorganism.

The laser illumination and scattering collection optics are designed to focus the beam to a near-diffraction limited spot size. This size ensures adequate laser signal on the microbe since Raman scattering is very inefficient. The collection optics are designed to efficiently capture scattered light and couple it into an optical spectrometer for analysis. The Raman signal can be acquired at one or more locations and the subsequent signal averaged.

Once the Raman spectra are obtained, it is analyzed for location and strength of key peaks in the spectra. This is compared to a stored reference data set of known microorganisms so that Gram type, morphological information and species identification can be obtained. The reference data set from known microorganisms can be obtained in the same instrument using the same methods and reading instrumentation.

The methods used for identification are described in greater detail in the co-pending applications filed on October 2009 cited an incorporated by reference herein at the beginning of this document, and the reader is directed to such patent applications for further details. The methods using intrinsic fluorescence and a taxonomic hierarchical classification method are also explained in detail below.

-   -   Disposal of sampling device 1902 and separation device 1904         (FIGS. 1, 23, item 1908)

After the test sample is injected from the sampling device 1902 into the separation device 1904, the sampling device 1902 is discarded into a biowaste container 1908 within the identification and/or characterization instrument 104. After the reading of the separation device 1904, the separation device 1904 is also discarded in the biowaste container 1908. The biowaste container is periodically removed from the identification/characterization instrument and emptied, and then replaced into the identification/characterization instrument.

User Interface

The identification instrument 104 preferably includes a user interface (not shown) which provides an operator with status information regarding specimen containers loaded into the identification instrument. The user interface may include some or all of the following features:

-   -   Touch screen display     -   Keyboard on touch screen.     -   System status     -   Positives alert     -   Communications to other systems (DMS, LIS, BCES & other         detection or identification Instruments).     -   Specimen Container status     -   Retrieve specimen containers     -   Visual and audible Positive Indicator     -   USB access (back ups and external system access).     -   Remote Notification of Identification and/or Characterization         Results, System Status and Error Messages

The particular appearance or layout of the user interface is not particularly important.

The results are sent to an output device 1926 (FIG. 1), which may be a computer memory, instrument display, printer, pager, cell phone, personal digital assistant, e-mail server, or other device. The results will typically include one or more of the following: clinical gram type of the microbial agent, identification and/or characterization of the species of the microbial agent, or other clinical information.

Specimen Container 500

The specimen container 500 shown in FIG. 1 is designed to hold and contain a sample and may take the form of a standard culture bottle, e.g., blood culture bottle. Preferred embodiments of the bottle incorporate a bar code (FIG. 1) for automated reading of the bottle 500 within the identification/characterization instrument 104 or off-line equipment. The bottle 500 includes a stopper (not shown) sealing the container from the environment having a pierceable septum. Optionally, where the bottle is used for both detection and automated identification, the bottle includes a colorimetric sensor formed or placed in the bottom of the bottle for purposes of colorimetric detection of the presence of microbial growth in the bottle 500. Specimen containers of the type shown in FIG. 1 are well known in the art and described in the patent literature cited in the Background section of this document, therefore a further description is unnecessary.

The configuration of the bottle is not particular important and the inventive system and methods can be adapted to a variety of containers for containing a sample. Thus, the present description of blood culture specimen containers is offered by way of example and not limitation.

II. Detailed Description of First Embodiment FIGS. 1-26

FIG. 2 shows one possible configuration of the identification/characterization instrument 104, including the cassette of disposables 1900, a rack or holder 1906 for positive specimen containers, a waste container 1908, a robotic transfer mechanism 1910, a sample removal apparatus 1912 which is attached or otherwise coupled to the robotic transfer mechanism 1910, a separation and concentration station 1916, and the identification and/or characterization module 1918. FIG. 3 is a top plan view of the arrangement of FIG. 2. The holder 1906 includes three racks that are oriented in one position for incubation and receiving new positive specimen containers, e.g., from a remote detection instrument or a manual loading door. In FIG. 4, the racks are moved to a position for sample removal from the specimen containers, and loading of the sample into the separation device 1904.

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of the identification/characterization instrument in the position of FIG. 4, showing the identification/characterization instrument 104 in further detail. The holder 1906 includes three separate racks 2310, each holding twenty specimen containers 500. The racks 2310 are rotatable as a unit about the horizontal axis to tilt the specimen containers into upward orientation (shown in FIG. 5) for purposes of venting the specimen containers and to a downward orientation (see FIG. 15) for sample removal.

The robotic transfer mechanism 1910 includes vertical guide rails 2320 and a horizontal guide rail 2324. The sample removal apparatus 1912 is moved from left to right and up and down by means of collars connected to the guide rails and a motor and belt driving subassembly (not shown, but conventional). Thus, the sample removal apparatus 1912 can move to any of the bottle positions in the three racks 2310, when the specimen containers are in either the upward or downward orientation. The sample removal apparatus 1912 can further move fore and aft by sliding along the guides 2322.

FIG. 5 also indicates that the instrument 104 includes electronics 2300, which includes a computer 1924 for processing fluorescence measurements, a memory 2302 storing results of the analysis and a further memory or processing units 2304 for storing program code for operation of the identification/characterization instrument 104. The electronics 2300 are preferably located behind suitable panels, which are not shown.

Cassette of Disposables

FIG. 5 shows a cassette 1900 of disposable devices which is loaded into the identification/characterization instrument 104. The cassette 1900 includes a multitude of sampling devices 1902 and separation devices 1904.

The separation device 1904 is shown in FIGS. 6-11. Referring to these Figures, the separation device consists of a body 2402 that defines a reservoir 2602 and a capillary tube 2604 which is connected to the reservoir 2602. The body 2402 defines an axis 2608 and the capillary tube 2604 is oriented along the axis 2608. A first end of the capillary tube 2610 is connected to the reservoir 2602 and the second end 2612 of the capillary tube communicates with a tube portion 2702 of an end piece 2502. The reservoir is accessed via a removable cap 2404 that threads onto threads 2502 formed at the top portion of the body 2402. The lower portion of the body 2402 is closed off by an end piece 2502 which is affixed to the body by means of a ridge 2704 fitting into a corresponding recess 2606 in the body and welding or use of an adhesive. The bottom wall 2506 of the end piece 2502 is of reduced thickness as indicated in FIG. 8. The end piece incorporates a capillary tube 2702 which is aligned with the capillary tube 2604 of the body 2402. The body 2402 proximate to the second end of the capillary tube is made from an optically transparent material; in the embodiment of FIG. 7 the end piece 2502 is optically transparent for facilitating optical interrogation of the concentrated microbial agent 2804 located at the bottom of the capillary tube 2604. The separation device 1904 is loaded with a density solution or “cushion” 2802 (FIG. 10), either preloaded with the material or less preferably the material is added to the separation device within the identification/characterization instrument.

FIGS. 12 and 13 show an embodiment of the separation device 1904 in which the body of the separation device 1904 is a one-piece construction. Walls 3002 provide support for the lower portion of the capillary tube 2602. The body proximate to the lower portion of the capillary tube 2604 is made from an optically transparent material.

FIG. 11 shows the operation of interrogation of concentrated microbial agent 2804 within the separation device 1904, an operation performed by the identification module 1918 of FIGS. 1 and 5. Light from a light source passes along an optical fiber 2902 and is directed by lens system 2904 to the base of the separation device 1904. The light stimulates the generation of fluorescence from the microbial agent 2804 and the fluorescence is directed via the optical fiber 2906 through the lens 2904 and fiber 2902 to a spectral dispersion system in the identification module (1918, FIG. 1) to the sensor array (1920, FIG. 1).

The sampling device 1902 is shown schematically and parts not to scale in FIG. 14. The device 1902 can take the form of a syringe-like device having a body 3200 defining a chamber 3204 and a sheathed needle 3202. The chamber 3204 may be pre-loaded with a selective lysis buffer 3206. The top of the chamber 3204 is sealed. The chamber may have a port 3208 which allows the sampling device to be connected to a vacuum or pneumatic unit to facilitate venting or sampling of a sample from the bottle 500. The lysis buffer 3206 can be pre-loaded into the sampling device 1902, or it may be loaded into the device 1902 in the instrument at the time of use.

In one embodiment, the lysis buffer loaded into the sampling device 1902 may be tailored to the specie(s) expected to be found. In one possible configuration, several reservoirs of selective lysis buffers are present in the instrument 104 and one of the lysis buffers is loaded into the sampling device at the time of use which is selected to be most optimal for the sample contained in a given specimen container. Additionally, the sampling can be repeated with different sampling devices each containing a different selective lysis buffer.

Sample Removal Apparatus (Sampling Head) 1912

The sample removal apparatus 1912 of FIGS. 1 and 5 operates to remove a portion of the biological sample in the positive detection container 500 from the detection container 500 and add the portion to a separation device 1904 obtained from the supply of separation devices 1900. The physical configuration of the sample removal apparatus 1912 can take a variety of forms, depending on the configuration of the specimen containers, the sampling device, and the separation device. In the illustrated embodiment the sample removal apparatus 1912 takes the form of articulating fingers that open and close so as to grasp the sampling device 1902 and the separation device 1904. The sample removal apparatus 1912 is moved to the required position for sampling and loading into the separation device by means of operation of the robotic transfer mechanism 1910.

Venting and Sampling

With reference to FIG. 15, the sample removal apparatus 1912 is moved to a position where it is placed directly over one of the sampling devices 1902 in the cassette 1900. The fingers of the sample removal apparatus 1912 grip the sampling device 1902 and the apparatus 1912 is raised upwards, removing the sampling device 1902 from the cassette 1900. As shown in FIG. 16, the specimen containers 500 are tilted upwards. The stopper at the top of the bottle is sterilized using UV light or a disinfecting agent (e.g., bleach or alcohol). As shown in FIG. 17, the bottle is vented by introducing the needle 3202 (FIG. 14) of the sampling device through a pierceable septum in the stopper of the bottle 500, equalizing the pressure within the interior of the bottle to that of ambient conditions. The port 3208 of the sampling device may be connected to the pneumatic system (1914, FIG. 1) during this process, e.g., a rolling diagram pump 1710 as shown in the second embodiment below.

As shown in FIGS. 18 and 19, the racks 2310 are then rotated to the downward orientation. The sample removal apparatus 1912, in conjunction the pneumatic system, withdraws a test sample (i.e., a portion of the specimen sample) from the bottle 500 into the sampling device 1902.

Lysis

The sampling device 1902 is optionally loaded with approximately 1 ml of a lysis buffer 3206 (FIG. 14). In this embodiment, an approximately 2 ml test sample is removed from the bottle 500 and mixed with the lysis buffer in the sampling device 1902, e.g., by agitation of the device 1902 after loading of the test sample into the sampling device 1902. The lysis operation is selective to non-microorganism components, e.g., blood cells, i.e., the microbial agent cells are not lysed.

The lysis buffer 3206 selectively lyses undesired cells (i.e., non-microorganism cells) that may be present in the sample, e.g., blood cells and/or tissue cells. The selective lysis of non-microorganism cells permits separation of microorganisms from other components that may be present in the sample. Accordingly, the lysis solution is one that is capable of selectively lysing cells, e.g., non-microorganism cells (e.g., by solubilizing eukaryotic cell membranes). The lysis solution may comprise one or more detergents, one or more enzymes, or a combination of one or more detergents and one or more enzymes.

Useful detergent may include one or more non-denaturing lytic detergent, such as Triton® X-100 Triton® X-100-R, Triton® X-114, NP-40, Genapol® C-100, Genapol® X-100, Igepal® CA 630, Arlasolve™ 200, Brij® 96/97, CHAPS, octyl β-D-glucopyranoside, saponin, and nonaethylene glycol monododecyl ether (C12E9, polidocenol). Optionally, denaturing lytic detergents can be included, such as sodium dodecyl sulfate, N-laurylsarcosine, sodium deoxycholate, bile salts, hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, SB3-10, SB3-12, amidosulfobetaine-14, and C7BzO. Optionally, solubilizers can also be included, such as Brij® 98, Brij® 58, Brij® 35, Tween® 80, Tween® 20, Pluronic® L64, Pluronic® P84, non-detergent sulfobetaines (NDSB 201), amphipols (PMAL-C8), and methyl-β-cyclodextrin. In one embodiment, polyoxyethylene detergent detergents may be preferred. The polyoxyethylene detergent can comprise the structure C₁₂₋₁₈/E₉₋₁₀, wherein C12-18 denotes a carbon chain length of from 12 to 18 carbon atoms and E9-10 denotes from 9 to 10 oxyethylene hydrophilic head groups. For example, the polyoxyethylene detergent can be selected from the group consisting of Brij® 97, Brij® 96V, Genapol® C-100, Genapol® X-100, nonaethylene glycol monododecyl ether (polidocanol), or a combination thereof. ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)

The lysis solution may also comprise one or more enzymes. Enzymes that can be used in the lysis solutions include, without limitation, enzymes that digest nucleic acids and other membrane-fouling materials (e.g., proteinase XXIII, DNase, neuraminidase, polysaccharidase, Glucanex®, and Pectinex®).

In another embodiment, one or more additional agents can be used, including for example, reducing agents such as 2-mercaptoethanol (2-Me) or dithiothreitol (DTT), stabilizing agents such as magnesium, pyruvate, and humectants, and/or chelating agents such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). The lysis solution can be buffered at any pH that is suitable to lyse the desired cells, and will depend on multiple factors, including without limitation, the type of sample, the cells to be lysed, and the detergent used. In some embodiments, the pH can be in a range from about 2 to about 13, e.g., about 6 to about 13, e.g., about 8 to about 13, e.g., about 10 to about 13. Suitable pH buffers include any buffer capable of maintaining a pH in the desired range, e.g., about 0.05 M to about 1.0 M CAPS.

Dispense into Separation Device 1904 and Separation/Concentration

As shown in FIGS. 20A and 20B, the sample removal apparatus 1912 carries the sampling device 1902 (loaded with a mixed lysis buffer and sample solution) to the position of one of the separation devices 1902 in the cassette 1900. The sample removal apparatus pierces the cap of the separation device 1904 with the needle 3202 of the sampling device 1902 and injects 0.5 to 1.0 ml of the test sample+lysis buffer mixture into the reservoir of the separation device 1904. The dispensing could also be performed after uncapping the separation device 1904 and recapping the separation device 1904 after recapping. The sample removal apparatus then transfers the sampling device 1902 to the waste container 1908 as shown in FIG. 20C and deposits it into the waste container.

In one embodiment, the separation is carried out by a centrifugation step in which the sample (e.g., a lysed sample) is placed on top of an approximately 1 ml liquid phase density cushion 2802 (FIG. 10) previously loaded in the separation device 1904 and the device 1904 is centrifuged under conditions (e.g., 10,000 g) which allow the microorganisms to be isolated and concentrated (e.g., the microorganisms form a pellet or pellet-like mass at the bottom and/or sides of the separation device 1904). “Density cushion” refers to a solution having a homogenous density throughout. The density of the cushion is selected such that the microorganisms in the sample pass through the cushion while other components of the sample (e.g., blood culture broth, cell debris) remain on top of the cushion or do not pass all of the way through the density cushion.

The material for the density cushion 2802 can be any material that has the appropriate density range for the methods of this invention. In general, the density of the cushion is in the range of about 1.025 to about 1.120 g/ml. In one embodiment, the material is colloidal silica. The colloidal silica may be uncoated (e.g., Ludox® (W.R. Grace, CT)) or coated, e.g., with silane (e.g., PureSperm® (Nidacon Int'l, Sweden) or Isolate® (Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, Calif.)) or polyvinylpyrrolidone (e.g., Percoll™, Percoll™ Plus (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.)). The colloidal silica may be diluted in any suitable medium to form the proper density, e.g., balanced salt solutions, physiological saline, and/or 0.25 M sucrose. Suitable densities can be obtained with colloidal silica at a concentration of about 15% to about 80% v/v, e.g., about 20% to about 65% v/v. Another suitable material for density cushions is an iodinated contrast agent, e.g., iohexyl (Omnipaque™ NycoPrep™, or Nycodenz®) and iodixanol (Visipaque™ or OptiPrep™). Suitable densities can be obtained with iohexyl or iodixanol at a concentration of about 10% to about 25% w/v. Sucrose can be used as a density cushion at a concentration of about 10% to about 30% w/v e.g., about 15% to about 20% w/v, for blood culture samples. Other suitable materials that can be used to prepare the density cushion include low viscosity, high density oils, such as microscope immersion oil (e.g., Type DF; Cargille Labs, New York), mineral oil (e.g., Drakeol® 5, Draketex 50, Peneteck®; Penreco Co., Pennsylvania), silicone oil (polydimethylsiloxane), fluorosilicone oil, silicone gel, metrizoate-Ficoll® (LymphoPrep™), e.g., at a concentration of about 75% to about 100% for blood culture samples, diatrizoate-dextran (PolymorphoPrep™), e.g., at a concentration of about 25% to about 50% for blood culture samples, carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose, polyethylene oxide (high molecular weight), Pluronic® F127, Pluronic® F68, mixtures of Pluronic® compounds, polyacrylic acid, cross-linked polyvinyl alcohol, cross-linked polyvinyl pyrrolidine, PEG methyl ether methacrylate, pectin, agarose, xanthan, gellan, Phytagel®, sorbitol, Ficoll® (e.g., Ficoll® 400 at a concentration of about 10% to about 15% for blood culture samples), glycerol, dextran (e.g., at a concentration of about 10% to about 15% for blood culture samples), glycogen, cesium chloride (e.g., at a concentration of about 15% to about 25% for blood culture samples), perfluorocarbon fluids (e.g., perfluoro-n-octane), hydrofluorocarbon fluids (e.g., Vertrel XF), and the like as are well known in the art. In one embodiment, the density cushion is selected from one or more of colloidal silica, iodixanol, iohexyl, cesium chloride, metrizoate-Ficoll®, diatrizoate-dextran, sucrose, Ficoll® 400, and/or dextran in any combination. The density cushion can also be made up of a combination of materials, e.g., a combination of colloidal silica and oil.

Transfer to Separation and Concentration Station (Centrifuge)

As shown in FIG. 21, after loading of the separation device 1904 with the mixed or lysed test sample, the sample removal apparatus 1912 retrieves the loaded separation device 1904, lifts it out of the cassette 1900, and moves the separation device 1904 to the centrifuge 1916. The separator 1904 is then placed into a holder or loading position of the centrifuge 1916.

A separation and concentration of the microbial agent in the sample occurs within the separation device 1904 using the centrifuge 1916.

The separation step can be carried out to separate the microorganisms from other components of the sample (e.g., non-microorganisms or components thereof) and to concentrate the microorganisms into a pellet that can be interrogated for identification and characterization purposes. The separation does not have to be complete, i.e., it is not required that 100% separation occur. All that is required is that the separation of the microorganisms from other components of the sample be sufficient to permit interrogation of the microorganisms without substantial interference from the other components.

The centrifuge spins the separation device 1904 at high speed in order to concentrate the microbial agent into the bottom of the capillary tube within the separation device 1904. The combination of the action of the lysis buffer on the non-microorganism cells (e.g., blood cells), the presence of the density solution within the separation device 1904, and the centrifugation, results in the separation of microbial agent from the lysed blood/broth mixture and the concentration of the microbial agent into a pellet or pellet-like mass in the bottom of the capillary tube, as shown in FIGS. 10 and 11.

In one embodiment, the separation device 1904 is centrifuged in station 1916 using a swing out rotor so that the microorganisms form a pellet directly on the bottom of the separation device 1904 (in the bottom of the capillary tube shown in FIGS. 8, 10 and 13). The separation device 1904 is centrifuged at a sufficient acceleration and for a sufficient time for the microorganisms to be separated (e.g., a pellet formed) from other components of the sample. The centrifugation acceleration can be about 1,000×g to about 20,000×g, e.g., about 2,500×g to about 15,000×g, e.g., about 7,500×g to about 12,500×g, etc. The centrifugation time can be about 30 seconds to about 30 minutes, e.g., about 1 minute to about 15 minutes, e.g., about 1 minute to about 5 minutes.

Reading

The identification and/or characterization module (read station 1918), which is shown positioned adjacent to the centrifuge then interrogates the concentrated microbial agent using fluorescence spectroscopy (e.g., intrinsic fluorescence and/or diffuse reflectance), Raman spectroscopy or other optical technique. In other embodiments, the microorganisms in the pellet can be interrogated using mass spectrometry techniques, such as MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) mass spectrometry, GC mass spectrometry, LC mass spectrometry, electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry and Selected Ion Flow Tube (SIFT) spectrometry. As shown in FIG. 22, the identification and/or characterization module 1918 may be physically located proximate to the centrifuge 1916, in which case the separation device 1904 does not need to be moved further by the robotic transfer mechanism. Alternatively, the identification and/or characterization module 1918 could be located in a different location within the identification/characterization instrument and the robotic transfer mechanism operates to move the separation device to the location of the identification and/or characterization module 1918.

Transfer to Waste

After reading, as shown in FIG. 23, the robotic transfer mechanism 1910 and sample removal apparatus 1912 operates to lift the separation device 1904 from the centrifuge 1916, transfers the separation device 1904 laterally and places it in the waste container 1908. FIG. 24 shows the waste container 1904 containing a multitude of the sampling devices 1902 and the separation devices 1908. When the waste container 1908 is full it is removed from the instrument and then replaced with an empty waste container. Prior to disposal of the separation device, a photographic image of the lower region of the separation device may be taken with a camera (not shown) to verify the separation process and provide valuable information on the identity of the isolate, such as pellet size, shape, color and density.

External Processing of Concentrated Microbial Agent

While in the above embodiment the concentrated microbial agent is interrogated while it is still located within the separation device 1904, it is possible to remove the concentrated microbial agent from the separation device and test it directly to identify and/or characterize the microbial agent.

In this variation, referring to FIG. 25, the separation device 1904 is transferred to a, removal device or station 4302. At the station 4302, the cap 2404 of the separation device 1904 is removed and the concentrated microbial agent 2804 is removed from the separation device 1904. The microbial agent is then subject to one or more additional tests. In one possible configuration, the microbial agent is supplied to a molecular diagnostic test unit 4310 which may include a disposable test strip or the like and processing instrument for identification of the agent. Alternatively, a sample of the microbial agent could be applied to a MALDI mass spectrometry plate 4314 and the plate inserted into a mass spectrometry unit 4312. Alternatively, the microbial agent could be delivered to a microbial identification and/or characterization test device 4318 (e.g., test card) and the card incubated and tested in a processing instrument 4316.

III. Method of Operation A. Flow Chart (FIGS. 26A, B, C)

The method of operation of the identification/characterization instrument 104 in an embodiment in which the specimen container 500 is subject to both detection and identification steps will now be described with reference to FIGS. 26A-26C.

The process starts at step 4402 with the loading of a sample into one of the containers 500 and delivery of the loaded container 500 to a detection instrument (as described in our prior provisional application and in co-pending application Ser. No. ______, “Automated microbial detection apparatus, attorney docket no. 01120). See FIG. 47, instrument 102.

At step 4404, the container 500 is loaded into the detection instrument 102, e.g., by placing the detection container on conveyer which delivers the container to the detection instrument or by manually loading the container. (See FIGS. 47 and 48 and the description of those figures below)

At step 4406, the container 500 is incubated within the detection instrument 102.

At step 4408 the detection container is read (by a detection unit in the instrument 102).

At step 4410, the reading of the detection container is analyzed to determine if the container is positive. If no, the processing branches along NO branch 4411 and a check is made if a timer has expired (step 4412). If the timer has expired, the bottle is deemed negative and the bottle is transferred to the waste container at step 4414. Otherwise, the incubation continues and steps 4406, 4408 and 4410 continue periodically.

If at step 4410 the detection container is positive, the processing proceeds to the YES branch 4416. The detection container is moved to the exit location in the detection instrument at step 4418. At step 4420 the detection container is transferred to the identification/characterization instrument 104, e.g., by moving the detection container 500 onto a conveyor and moving it into the entrance location of the identification/characterization instrument (see FIG. 47). The transfer could occur by some other manner, the details of which can vary widely.

At step 4422 (FIG. 26B), the detection container is placed into one of the racks 2310 of the identification/characterization instrument 104. The robotic transfer mechanism 1910 may be used in this process.

At step 4424, the detection container is aseptically vented. This step may occur prior to picking up of the sampling device or may occur after picking up the sampling device, see FIGS. 15 and 16.

At step 4426, one of the sampling devices 1902 is picked up from the cassette 1900. The sampling device 1902 is pre-loaded with a selective lysis buffer as shown in FIG. 15; alternatively the lysis buffer is added to the sampling device at this time.

At step 4428, a protective cap (not shown), if fitted, covering the needle 3202 of the sampling device is removed.

At step 4430, the needle 3202 is inserted into a upright vented container 500 (see FIGS. 16 and 17).

At step 4432, the detection container is inverted (see FIGS. 18 and 19) and a small sample (e.g., a 2.0 ml sample) is removed from the container 500.

At step 4434, the container 500 is rotated to an upright orientation and the needle 3202 of the sampling device 1902 is removed.

At step 4436, a small volume (e.g., 0.5 ml sample) of air is introduced into the sampling device. This could be accomplished automatically using the pneumatic system 1914 connected to the sampling device.

At step 4438, a protective cap for the needle 3202, if fitted, is replaced.

At step 4440, the sampling device 1902 is inverted and agitated to thoroughly mix the test sample with the selective lysis buffer.

At step 4442, the protective cap for the needle 3202, if fitted, is again removed. (Note: a station fitted with appropriate gripping or grasping features could be provided for automatically removing and replacing the cap of the needle or alternatively the cap could remain on the needle as described in the second embodiment)

At step 4444, a small portion of the positive broth/lysis buffer mix is discarded into a waste container.

At step 4446, the sample removal apparatus moves the sampling device 1902 to the position above one of the separation devices 1904 (see FIG. 38) and pierces the cap with the needle of the sampling device. The separation device 1904 is pre-loaded with the density cushion in this embodiment.

In one possible variation, the lysis buffer is also loaded into the separation device 1904 with the density cushion, and the mixing of the sample and the lysis buffer takes place within the separation device 1904.

At step 4448, the sample removal apparatus 1912 gently adds 0.5 to 1.0 ml of the sample/lysis buffer mixture (i.e., lysed sample) on top of the density cushion already present in the reservoir of the separation device 1904. See FIGS. 20A and 20B.

At step 4450, the sample removal apparatus 1912 is moved to the position of the waste container 1908 and the sampling device 1902 is discarded. See FIG. 20C.

At step 4452, the sample removal apparatus returns to the separation device 1904 and picks it up out of the cassette 1900 and moves it to the location of the separation and concentration station 1916, and places the separation device 1904 into the centrifuge. See FIG. 21.

At step 4454, the centrifuge cycle is started.

At step 4456, after completion of the centrifugation process, the separation device is moved to the identification and/or characterization module 1918 (reading station). Where the reading station is proximate to the centrifuge, the centrifuge is rotated to a reading position wherein the separation device 1904 is positioned for reading as shown in FIG. 11.

At step 4458, the optical scan of the separation device 1904 in the identification and/or characterization module is started (See FIG. 21, 22).

At step 4460, after completion of the reading operation, the separation device 1904 is placed into the waste container 1908 (see FIGS. 23, 24).

B. Interrogation Step 4458, and the Identification and/or Characterization of Microorganisms in Identification Module 1918

Once the microorganisms present in the sample have been isolated and/or pelleted in the separation device 1904, the isolated sample or pellet can be interrogated (e.g., spectroscopically) to characterize and/or identify the microorganisms in the sample or pellet in step 4458. The interrogation can take place in a non-invasive manner, that is, the pellet can be interrogated while it remains in the separation device 1904. The ability to identify the microorganisms in a non-invasive manner, optionally coupled with keeping the container sealed (e.g., hermetically sealed) throughout the separation and characterization/identification process and automating the procedure avoids the constant handling of contaminated and/or infectious samples and greatly increases the safety of the entire process. Furthermore, the ability to characterize and/or identify microorganisms by direct interrogation without further processing of the sample or pellet (e.g., resuspension, plating, and growth of colonies), greatly increases the speed with which identification/characterization can be made.

In one embodiment, optical spectroscopic methods can be used to analyze one or more intrinsic properties of the microorganisms, e.g., a property present within the microorganism in the absence of additional agents, such as stains, dyes, binding agents, etc. In other embodiments, the optical spectroscopic methods can be used to analyze one or more extrinsic properties of the microorganisms, e.g., a property that can only be detected with the aid of additional agents. The interrogation can be carried out using, for example, fluorescence spectroscopy, diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy, terahertz spectroscopy, transmission and absorbance spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, including Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS), Spatially Offset Raman spectroscopy (SORS), transmission Raman spectroscopy, and/or resonance Raman spectroscopy or combination thereof.

The spectroscopic interrogation can be carried out by any technique known to those of skill in the art to be effective for detecting and/or identifying one or more intrinsic or extrinsic properties of microorganisms. For example, front face fluorescence (where the exciting and emitted light enters and leaves the same optical surface, and if the sample is generally optically thick, the excitation light penetrates a very short distance into the sample (see, e.g., Eisinger, J., and J. Flores, “Front-face fluorometry of liquid samples,” Anal. Biochem. 94:15 (1983)) can be used for identification of microorganisms in pellets. Other forms of measurement, such as epifluorescence, reflectance, absorbance, and/or scatter measurements, can also be employed in step 4458.

Typically, the light source, or excitation source, results in the excitation of the sample, followed by measurement of the emission of fluorescence of the sample at predetermined time points or continuously. Similarly, the reflected light from interaction of the excitation source with the sample may be measured to provide pertinent data for identification and/or characterization. The emission from the sample may be measured by any suitable means of spectral discrimination, most preferably employing a spectrometer.

In a presently preferred embodiment, control measurements (e.g., fluorescence spectra) are taken for known microorganisms, thus allowing for correlation of measured test data with characterization of the microorganisms of interest using various mathematical methods known to those skilled in the art. The measured test data from known microorganisms is stored in machine-readable memory, e.g., within the instrument 104 itself or within an associated data processing device, such as connected workstation. For example, the data from samples being tested by the instrument 104 may be compared with the baseline or control measurements utilizing software routines known to or within the ability of persons skilled in the art to develop. More particularly, the data may be analyzed by a number of multivariate analysis methods, such as, for example, General Discriminant Analysis (GDA), Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLSDA), Partial Least Squares regression, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC), Neural Network Analysis (NNA) and/or Support Vector Machine (SVM). These methods may be used to classify unknown microorganisms of interest in the sample being tested into relevant groups (e.g., species) based on existing nomenclature, and/or into naturally occurring groups based on the organism's metabolism, pathogenicity and/or virulence in designing the system for monitoring, detecting and/or characterizing the organism as described previously.

To enhance Raman (SERS) and fluorescence signals, microorganisms could either be coated with gold and/or silver nanoparticles prior to centrifugation, and/or the inner optical surface could be pre-coated with metal colloids of particular size and shape (refs: Lakowicz, Anal. Biochem. 337:171 (2005) for fluorescence; Efrima et al., J. Phys. Chem. B. (Letter) 102:5947 (1998) for SERS). In another embodiment, the nanoparticles are present in the density cushion prior to centrifugation and associate with microorganisms as the microorganisms pass through the density cushion.

The sample illumination source (See FIG. 11), or excitation source, may be selected from any number of suitable light sources as known to those skilled in the art. Any portion of the electromagnetic spectrum that produces usable data can be used. Light sources capable of emission in the ultraviolet, visible and/or near-infrared spectra, as well as other portions of the electromagnetic spectrum, can be utilized and are known to those skilled in the art. For example, light sources may be continuum lamps such as a deuterium or xenon arc lamp for generation of ultraviolet light and/or a tungsten halogen lamp for generation of visible/near-infrared excitation. These light sources provide a broad emission range and the spectral bandwidth for specific excitation wavelengths may be reduced using optical interference filters, prisms and/or optical gratings, as are well known in the art.

Alternatively, a plurality of narrowband light sources, such as light emitting diodes and/or lasers, may be spatially and/or temporally multiplexed to provide a multi-wavelength excitation source. For example, light emitting diodes are available from 240 nm to in excess of 900 nm and the sources have a spectral bandwidth of 20-40 nm (full width at half maximum). Lasers are available in discrete wavelengths from the ultraviolet to the near-infrared and can be employed using multiplexing methods well known to those skilled in the art.

The spectral selectivity of any of the light sources may be improved by using spectral discrimination means such as a scanning monochromator. Other methods of discrimination may be utilized, as known to those of skill in the art, such as an acousto-optic tunable filter, liquid crystal tunable filter, an array of optical interference filters, prism spectrograph, etc., and in any combination. A consideration in selecting the spectral discriminator takes into the account the range of tunability as well as the level of selectivity. By way of illustration, for example, a discriminator might utilize the wavelength range of 300-800 nm with a selectivity of 10 nm. These parameters generally determine the optimum technology necessary to achieve the tunability range as well as the selectivity.

Typically, the light source results in the excitation of the sample, followed by measurement of the emission of fluorescence of the sample at predetermined time points or continuously. Similarly, the reflected light from interaction of the excitation source with the sample may be measured to provide pertinent data for detection and/or characterization.

The emission from the sample may be measured by any suitable means of spectral discrimination, most preferably employing a spectrometer. The spectrometer may be a scanning monochromator that detects specific emission wavelengths whereby the output from the monochromator is detected by a photomultiplier tube and/or the spectrometer may be configured as an imaging spectrograph whereby the output is detected by an imaging detector array such as a charge-coupled device (CCD) detector array. In one embodiment, a discriminator allows the observation of the fluorescence and/or scattering signal by a photodetection means (such as a photomultiplier tube, avalanche photodiode, CCD detector array, and/or electron multiplying charge coupled device (EMCCD) detector array).

The spectroscopic technique is used to obtain measurements that are preferably provided as Excitation-Emission Matrix (EEM) measurements. As used herein, EEM is defined as the luminescent spectral emission intensity of fluorescent substances as a function of both excitation and emission wavelength, and includes a full spectrum or a subset thereof, where a subset may contain a single or multiple excitation/emission pairs(s). Additionally, a cross section of the EEM with a fixed excitation wavelength may be used to show the emission spectra for a specific excitation wavelength, and a cross section of the EEM with a fixed emission wavelength may be used to show the excitation spectra for a sample. In one embodiment, multiple EEMs are measured at more than one specific excitation-emission wavelength pair, e.g., at least at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more specific excitation-emission wavelength pairs.

It has been found that a front-face fluorescence spectroscopy provides an advantage in measuring the fluorescence and/or reflectance properties of highly scattering and highly quenching samples. In one embodiment, the front-face method may be particularly useful. For example, front-face fluorescence may be particularly useful in highly absorbent samples because the excitation and emission beam does not need to travel through the bulk of the sample, and thus, may be less affected by the interfering components that may be contained therein (e.g., blood cells and microbiological culture media). The optical surface of the separation device 1904 may be illuminated at such an angle as to provide acceptable results as known to those skilled in the art, (e.g., Eisinger, J., and J. Flores, “Front-face fluorometry of liquid samples,” Anal. Biochem. 94:15-21 (1983)). In one embodiment, the system is designed such that the spectroscopic system measures diffuse reflected light at a minimum of one fixed angle in addition to measuring emitted fluorescence at a minimum of one fixed angle.

In yet another embodiment, non-spectroscopic measurements from the detection system that detected the specimen container as “positive” (item 102 in FIG. 47), such as detection times and growth rates can be used to assist in the characterization and/or identification of microorganisms from the isolated sample or pellet. Additionally, measurements taken from a photographic image of the lower region of the separation device can provide valuable information on the identity of the isolate, such as pellet size, shape, color and density.

In some embodiments, characterization and/or identification of the microorganisms in the isolated sample or pellet need not involve identification of an exact species. Characterization encompasses the broad categorization or classification of biological particles as well as the actual identification of a single species. Classification of microorganism from an isolated sample or pellet may comprise determination of phenotypic and/or morphologic characteristics for the microorganism. For example, characterization of the biological particles may be accomplished based on observable differences, such as, composition, shape, size, clustering and/or metabolism. In some embodiments, classification of the biological particles of interest may require no prior knowledge of the characteristics of a given biological particle but only requires consistent correlations with empiric measurements thus making this method more general and readily adaptable than methods based on specific binding events or metabolic reactions. As used herein “identification” means determining to which family, genus, species, and/or strain a previously unknown microorganism belongs to. For example, identifying a previously unknown microorganism to the family, genus, species, and/or strain level.

In some instances, characterization encompasses classification models which provide sufficient useful information for action to be taken. As used herein, the preferred classification models comprise grouping into one or more of the following: (1) Gram Groups; (2) Clinical Gram Groups; (3) Therapeutic Groups; (4) Functional Groups; and (5) Natural Intrinsic Fluorescence Groups.

(1) Gram Groups: Within the Gram Groups classification, microorganisms may be placed into one of three broad classification categories based on their Gram staining reaction and overall size, said groups selected from one or more of the following: (a) Gram positive microorganisms that stain dark blue with Gram staining; (b) Gram negative microorganisms that stain red with Gram staining; and (c) yeast cells that stain dark blue with Gram staining, but are very large rounded cells that are distinguished from bacteria by their morphological characteristics and size.

(2) Clinical Gram Groups: The Gram Groups may be further divided into several sub-categories representing distinguishing morphological features. These sub-categories comprise all the relevant clinical information reported by an experienced laboratory technologist, and thus provide a higher level of identification than a positive or negative Gram reaction. This particular classification is very helpful because it eliminates concerns about relying on the quality of a Gram stain and/or the skill level of the technician reading the smear by providing the equivalent clinically relevant information with an automated system. More specifically, subcategories of microorganisms based on this classification model may be selected from one or more of the following: (a) cocci, which are small rounded cells; (b) diplococci, which are two small rounded cells joined together; (c) rods, which are rectangular shape; and (d) bacilli, which are rod shaped. Examples of these sub-categories that can be ascertained by additional morphological information include: (i) Gram positive cocci; (ii) Gram positive cocci in chains; (iii) Gram positive cocci in clusters (i.e., “grape-like” clusters); (iv) Gram positive diplococci; (v) Gram positive rods; (vi) Gram positive rods with endospores; (vii) Gram negative rods; (viii) Gram negative coccobacilli; (ix) Gram negative diplococci; (x) yeast; and (xi) filamentous fungi.

(3) Therapeutic Groups: The therapeutic groups comprise multiple microbial species that, when isolated from particular specimen types, are treated with the same class of antibiotics or mixture of antibiotics (e.g., as described in “Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy 2008”). In many cases, identity to the species level is not required by the clinician to enable a change from initial empiric therapy to a more targeted therapy because more than one species can be treated with the same choice of antibiotic(s). This classification level correctly places these “same-treatment” microorganisms into single therapeutic categories. Examples of this characterization level include the ability to distinguish highly resistant Enterobacteriacae (EB) species from sensitive EB species (Enterobacter spp. from E. coli), or fluconazole-resistant Candida species (C. glabrata and C. kruzei) from sensitive Candida species (C. albicans and C. parapsilosis), and so on.

(4) Functional Groups: According to the invention, microorganisms may also be placed into several groups based upon a mixture of metabolic, virulence and/or phenotypic characteristics. Non-fermentative organisms may be clearly distinguished from fermentative ones. Furthermore, microorganism species that produce hemolysins may be grouped separately from non-hemolytic species. In some cases, these groups represent broader categories than genus level (e.g., coliforms, Gram negative non-fermentative rods), some at the genus level (e.g., Enterococcus, Candida), and some with closer to species-level discrimination (e.g., coagulase-negative staphylococci, alpha-hemolytic streptococci, beta-hemolytic streptococci, coagulase-positive staphylococci, i.e., S. aureus).

(5) Natural Intrinsic Fluorescence (“IF”) Groups: Microorganisms may also be placed into categories based on their natural tendency to group together by their innate and/or intrinsic fluorescence characteristics. Some of these groups may be common to Therapeutic and Functional Group categories. These groupings may comprise individual species, such as E. faecalis, S. pyogenes, or P. aeruginosa that have characteristic IF signatures and/or may contain small groups of organisms with relatively conserved IF signatures such as the K. pneumoniae-K. oxytoca or E. aerogenes-E. cloacae groups.

In addition to measuring intrinsic properties of microorganisms (such as intrinsic fluorescence) for identification purposes, the methods may use additional identifier agents to aid in the separation and/or identification process. Agents that bind to specific microorganisms, such as affinity ligands, can be used to separate microorganisms, to identify a class or species of microorganism (e.g., through binding to a unique surface protein or receptor) and/or to identify a characteristic of the microorganism (e.g., antibiotic resistance). Useful identifier agents include, without limitation, monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies and fragments thereof (e.g., anti-Eap for S. aureus identification), nucleic acid probes, antibiotics (e.g., penicillin, vancomycin, polymyxin aptamers, peptide mimetics, phage-derived binding proteins, lectins, host innate immunity biomarkers (acute phase proteins, LPS-binding protein, CD14, mannose binding lectin, Toll-like receptors), host defense peptides (e.g., defensins, cathelicidins, proteogrins, magainins), bacterocins (e.g., lantibiotics, such as nisin, mersacidin, epidermin, gallidermin, and plantaricin C, and class II peptides), bacteriophages, and dyes selective for nucleic acids, lipids, carbohydrates, polysaccharides, capsules/slime or proteins, or any combination thereof. If the agent does not itself give out a detectable signal, the agent can be labeled to provide a detectable signal, such as by conjugating the agent to a marker (e.g., visible or fluorescent). Markers include, without limitation, fluorescent, luminescent, phosphorescent, radioactive, and/or colorimetric compounds. The agent can be added to the microorganisms at any step in the methods of the invention, e.g., when the sample is obtained, during lysis, and/or during separation. In some embodiments, the presence of the agent in the pellet can be determined during interrogation of the pellet. Other useful identifier agents include substrates for microbial enzymes, chelating agents, photosensitizing agent, quenching agent, reducing agent, oxidizing agent, buffer, acid, base, solvent, fixative, detergents, surfactants, disinfectants (eg. alcohols, bleach, hydrogen peroxide) and toxic compounds (eg. sodium azide, potassium cyanide) and metabolic inhibitors such as cyclohexamide, etc. Similarly, many fluorescent compounds for measuring microbial cell viability, metabolism and/or membrane potential may be used as an identifier agent in the present invention. As would be readily appreciated by one of skill in the art, the sensitivity of a particular microorganism to any compound affecting its physical state or metabolism, such as an antibiotic, could be rapidly ascertained by adding the compound to the sample, lysis buffer, density cushion or any mixture thereof.

An embodiment of a method for performing identification and/or characterization of microbial agents in samples using intrinsic fluorescence will now be described in conjunction with FIGS. 51-59. Basically, the method can be embodied as a sequence of processing instructions stored in memory and executed using a conventional data processor or computer. The method executes an algorithm shown in FIGS. 51A-51C which is designed to provide the identification of a blood culture isolate (concentrated pellet) given an intrinsic fluorescence (IF) scan of the isolate from a predefined set of emission wavelengths.

In preferred embodiments, the method is encoded as software instructions implementing a multi-level identification algorithm, the different levels corresponding to different levels of a taxonomic hierarchy. Traditional classification algorithms that take input data and determine the identification of a microorganism use a single classification model. Given data from an intrinsic fluorescence scan at a predefined set of wavelengths of an unknown organism, the multi-leveled identification algorithm classifies the organism following the branches of a taxonomic hierarchy—Gram class, family, and species. A unique feature is the use of separate classification models at each identification step from highest, Gram class, to lowest, species. Additionally, the approach incorporates the use of parallel classification models to evaluate consistency between results. Thus, the probability of accurate identification and/or characterization is maximized, and generation of incorrect identification or characterization results is minimized. The multi-level taxonomic hierarchical classification method is applicable to other data sets besides intrinsic fluorescence data (e.g. it could be used to Raman spectral data or mass spectral data).

The identification method includes a set of data pre-processing steps (shown as blocks 5102, 5104 and 5106 of FIG. 51A, and a set of analysis steps (the remaining blocks 5108, 5110, etc. in FIGS. 51B, 51C). The method determines the identification of the organism at multiple levels of the taxonomic hierarchy. The pre-processing steps are designed to acquire IF scan data and perform data transformations that minimize variation between different strains of a microbial agent within a given organism group or species. The data analysis steps implement a multi-level identification using parallel classification models, as will be understood from the following discussion.

As noted above, preferred embodiments provide an organism identification at the Gram, family, and species levels. Organisms commonly found in blood cultures that can be identified by the algorithm include, but not necessarily limited to, those listed in Table 1. Obviously, for different applications (e.g., food, water, environmental samples, etc.) the organisms may differ from those listed in Table 1, however the methodology is the same.

TABLE 1 Intrinsic Fluorescence Algorithm Identification Organism List Gram Class Family Species Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae C. freundii E. aerogenes E. cloacae Complex E. coli K. oxytoca K. pneumoniae M. morganii P. mirabilis P. stuartii P. vulgaris S. enteritidis S. marcescens Moraxellaceae A. baumanii Neisseriaceae N. meningitidis Pasteurellaceae H. influenzae Pseudonomadaceae P. aeruginosa Xanthomonadaceae S. maltophilia Gram-positive Enterococcaceae E. faecalis E. faecium Listeriaceae L. monocytogenes Staphylococcaceae S. aureus S. capitis S. epidermidis S. hominis S. lugdunensis S. warneri Streptococcaceae S. agalactiae S. bovis S. mitis/S. oralis S. pneumoniae S. pyogenes Yeast Ascomycetes C. albicans C. glabrata C. krusei C. parapsilosis C. tropicalis

The processing steps or modules shown in FIGS. 51A-C will now be described in detail.

Pre-Processing

Step 5102: Obtain a fluorescence value, n_(ij), for each excitation value, i=1, 2, . . . , x, and each emission, j=1, 2, . . . , y, combination. The ratio, emission value/excitation value, must fall within the interval (1.05, 1.95).

Step 5104: For each fluorescence value, n_(ij), calculate the natural logarithm value, ln (n_(ij)).

Step 5106: Calculate the 1^(st) derivative of the natural log transform (from step 5104) for each emission value, j=2, 3, . . . , y-1, across a given excitation wavelength, i.

It is advantageous to transform the raw fluorescence data to minimize strain-to-strain variation within each organism group, using both steps 5104 and 5106. Additionally, the transformation process tends to create similar variance across organism groups. FIGS. 52, 53 and 54 illustrate by way of example the effects of performing the described pre-processing for multiple strains of Staphylococcus aureus evaluated across the emission range at excitation 315. In FIG. 52, each line represents the fluorescence signal from a single strain. The line 5202 indicates the mean fluorescence signal at each emission value. FIG. 53 shows the strain-to-strain variation in the fluorescence signal after application of the natural logarithm transformation (step 5104); note that the curve for all of the strains are close together. FIG. 54 shows the strain-to-strain variation at excitation of 315 nm after calculation of the first derivative of the natural logarithm transform (step 5106). Again, note that the curve for all the strains are very close together, particularly at the emission range of 400-610 nm.

As another example, FIG. 55 shows the strain-to-strain variation in the fluorescence signal at excitation of 415 nm for Candida parapsilosis, prior to performing the transformation steps. Note the wide variation in emission in the range of 400-650 nm. Strain-to-strain variation for this organism at excitation of 415 nm after performing the natural logarithm transformation is shown in FIG. 56. Strain-to-strain variation after performing the first derivative transformation is shown in FIG. 57. Note that in FIG. 57 the strain-to-strain variation is much reduced.

Analysis

Step 5108: The first level of classification in the analysis after performing the pre-processing steps is gram classification 5108. At this step, the processing includes two branches, one represented by steps 5110 and 5112 and another represented by steps 5114 and 5116. FIG. 51A is not meant to imply that the branches could not be performed sequentially; the branches could be performed either sequentially or in parallel.

Step 5110: Gram Classification Distance Calculation. Using the 1^(st) derivative transforms for a predefined set of excitation/emission pairs, calculate the distance,

d _(a)=[(m−m _(a))^(t)Σ⁻¹(m−m _(a))]^(1/2)

for each Gram class defined in the model where

-   -   a=1, 2, 3, represents the Gram classes defined in the model     -   m represent the vector of calculated values of the 1^(st)         derivative, m_(ij), for each excitation/emission pair i, j     -   m_(a) represent the vector of mean values m_(a(ij)) from a         distribution for each class a at excitation/emission pair i, j     -   t represent the transpose of the vector     -   (m−m_(a)) represent the vector of differences m_(ij)−m_(a(ij))         for each excitation/emission pair i, j     -   Σ⁻¹ represents the inverse of the covariance matrix for the         predefined set of excitation/emission pair. The set of         excitation and emission pairs are experimentally determined from         fluorescence measurements (with preprocessing performed) of         known microorganisms (see FIGS. 58 and 59 and the discussion         below).         The term “model” is used to refer to a set of known microbial         agents for which IF measurements (including transforms) at the         predetermined excitation wavelengths have been previously         obtained and for which a specimen is a candidate for         classification, e.g., the agents listed in Table 1.

Step 5112: Gram Classification Interpretation.

-   -   Let u_(g) represent the maximum distance threshold     -   If all distances, d₁, d₂, and d₃, are greater than u_(g), the         classification result is Unknown     -   Else, determine the value of d_(min), the minimum value of d₁,         d₂, and d₃     -   Let w_(g) represent the low discrimination threshold factor     -   If more than one distance, d₁, d₂, and d₃, is less than         (d_(min)*w_(q)), the classification result is Low Discrimination         between the Gram classes having distances less than         (d_(min)*w_(q))     -   If only one distance, d₁, d₂, and d₃, is less than         (d_(min)*w_(q)), the classification result is the corresponding         Gram class.

Step 5114: All Families Classification Distance Calculation

Using the 1^(st) derivative transforms for a predefined set of excitation/emission pairs, calculate the distance,

d _(a)=[(m−m _(a))^(t)Σ⁻¹(m−m _(a))]^(1/2)

for each organism family defined in the model where

-   -   a=1, 2, . . . , k, represents all of the organism families         defined in the model     -   Σ⁻¹ represents the inverse of the covariance matrix for the         predefined set of excitation/emission pairs (same remark as         above, the set of excitation and emission pairs are         experimentally determined)     -   m represent the vector of calculated values of the 1^(st)         derivative, m_(ij), for each excitation/emission pair i, j     -   m_(a) represent the vector of mean values m_(a(ij)) from a         distribution for each class a at excitation/emission pair i, j     -   t represent the transpose of the vector     -   (m−m_(a)) represent the vector of differences m_(ij)−m_(a(ij))         for each excitation/emission pair i, j         Note: The predefined set of excitation/emission pairs can be         unique for the gram classification versus all species         classification.

Step 5116: All Families Classification Interpretation

-   -   Let u_(f) represent the maximum distance threshold     -   If all distances, d₁, d₂, d_(a), are greater than u_(f), the         classification result is Unknown     -   Else, determine the value of d_(min), the minimum value of d₁,         d₂, . . . , d_(a)     -   Let w_(f) represent the low discrimination threshold factor     -   If more than one distance, d₁, d₂, . . . , d_(a), is less than         (d_(min)*W_(f)), the classification result is Low Discrimination         between the organism families having distances less than         (d_(min)*w_(f))     -   If only one distance, d₁, d₂, . . . , d_(a), is less than         (d_(min)*w_(q)), the classification result is the corresponding         family.

Step 5118: Pooling gram and all families classification interpretations for final gram classification result.

If the Gram classification is a single choice and the all families classification is a single choice, the pooled classification result is the indicated Gram class if the family classification falls under the taxonomic hierarchy of the Gram class.

If the Gram classification is a single choice and the all families classification is a single choice, the pooled classification result is Unknown if the family classification does not fall under the taxonomic hierarchy of the Gram class.

If the Gram classification is a single choice and the all families classification is a low discrimination, the pooled classification is the indicated Gram class if the family associated with the shortest distance falls under the taxonomic hierarchy of the Gram class.

If the Gram classification is a single choice and the all families classification is a low discrimination, the pooled classification is Unknown if the family associated with the shortest distance does not fall under the taxonomic hierarchy of the Gram class.

If the Gram classification is a low discrimination and the all families classification is a single choice, the pooled classification result is the Gram class that corresponds to the Gram class under which the family resides on the taxonomic hierarchy.

If the Gram classification is a low discrimination and the all families classification is a single choice, the pooled classification result is Unknown if none of the Gram classes correspond to the Gram class under which the family resides on the taxonomic hierarchy.

If the Gram classification and the all families classification are both Unknown, the pooled classification result is Unknown.

The processing then proceeds to step 5120, Gram Family Classification, a second level of classification. This step consists of sub-steps 5122, 5124 and 5126.

Step 5122: Gram family classification distance calculation.

Using the 1^(st) derivative estimates for a predefined set of excitation/emission pair that are specific to the Gram classification result, calculate the distance,

d _(a)=[(m−m _(a))^(t)Σ⁻¹(m−m _(a))]^(1/2)

for each organism family defined in the model, where

-   -   a=1, 2, . . . , k, represents the number of organism families         defined in the model     -   Σ⁻¹ represents the inverse of the covariance matrix for the         predefined set of excitation/emission pairs (same remark as         before regarding the pairs)     -   m represents the vector of calculated values of the 1^(st)         derivative, m_(ij), for each excitation/emission pair i, j     -   m_(a) represent the vector of mean values m_(a(ij)) from a         distribution for each class a at excitation/emission pair i, j     -   t represent the transpose of the vector     -   (m−m_(a)) represent the vector of differences m_(ij)−m_(a(ij))         for each excitation/emission pair i, j

Step 5124: Gram Family Classification Interpretation

Let u_(t) represent the maximum distance threshold If all distances, d₁, d₂, d_(a), are greater than u_(t), the classification result is Unknown Else, determine the value of d_(min), the minimum value of d₁, d₂, . . . , d_(a) Let w_(t) represent the low discrimination threshold factor If more than one distance, d₁, d₂, . . . , d_(a), is less than (d_(min)*w_(t)), the classification result is Low Discrimination between the organism families having distances less than (d_(min)*w_(t)), If only one distance, d₁, d₂, . . . , d_(a), is less than (d_(min)*w_(t)), the classification result is the corresponding family.

Step 5126 Gram Family Classification Result.

If the Gram family classification result is Unknown, the test organism classification is finalized at the Gram level.

If the Gram family classification result is Low Discrimination, the test organism classification is finalized as the Gram and families included in the low discrimination.

If the Gram family classification result a single family, the IF data from the test organism are further analyzed to determine if a species level identification can be determined.

Step 5128 Gram family Species Classification. The processing instructions proceed to a gram family species classification level, consisting of sub-steps 5130, 5132, and 5134.

Step 5130 Gram family species classification distance calculation.

Using the 1^(st) derivative estimates for a predefined set of excitation/emission pair that are specific to the Gram family classification result, calculate the distance,

d _(a)=[(m−m _(a))^(t)Σ⁻¹(m−m _(a))]^(1/2)

for each organism species defined in the model, where

-   -   a=1, 2, . . . , k, represents the number of organism species         defined in the model     -   Σ⁻¹ represents the inverse of the covariance matrix for the         predefined set of excitation/emission pairs (same remark as         before)     -   m represents the vector of calculated values of the 1^(st)         derivative, m_(ij), for each excitation/emission pair i, j     -   m_(a) represent the vector of mean values m_(a(ij)) from a         distribution for each class a at excitation/emission pair i, j     -   t represent the transpose of the vector     -   (m−m_(a)) represent the vector of differences m_(ij)−m_(a(ij))         for each excitation/emission pair i, j

Step 5132 Gram family species classification interpretation.

-   -   Let u_(s) represent the maximum distance threshold.     -   If all distances, d₁, d₂, . . . , d_(a), are greater than u_(t),         the classification result is Unknown.     -   Else, determine the value of d_(min), the minimum value of d₁,         d₂, . . . , d_(a).     -   Let w_(s) represent the low discrimination threshold factor.

If more than one distance, d₁, d₂, . . . , d_(a), is less than (d_(min)*w_(s)), the classification result is Low Discrimination between the organism species having distances less than (d_(min)* w_(s))

-   -   If only one distance, d₁, d₂, . . . , d_(a), is less than         (d_(min)*w_(t)), the classification result is the corresponding         species.

Step 5134 Gram family species classification result.

If the Gram family species classification result is Unknown, the test organism classification is finalized at the Gram and family level.

If the Gram family species classification result is Low Discrimination, the test organism classification is finalized as the Gram, family, and species included in the low discrimination.

If the Gram family species classification result a single species, the test organism classification is finalized at the Gram, family, and species level.

At step 5136, the results determined at steps 5134, 5118, and 5126 are returned and reported to the user, e.g., on a user interface for the identification instrument, transmitted to an attached workstation, returned to another software module, or otherwise generated for the user.

In regards to organism identification (steps 5134, 5118 and 5126), discrimination between species is possible only if the values of the first derivative (of the natural logarithm transform of the emission value) are unique for each species in the model at some portion of the emission range for at least one excitation wavelength. FIGS. 58 and 59 illustrate the discrimination potential between a subset of species for excitation wavelengths 315 nm (FIG. 58) and 415 nm (FIG. 59). Referring to FIG. 58, it is apparent that several of the species can be discriminated from the others based on the first derivative at excitation wavelength 315. The mathematical model uses the first derivative values for emissions where visual differences exist as inputs (i.e., reference data) to discriminate between species. Using selected sections of values across the emission range the following species can be clearly discriminated from the others: E. coli, H. influenzae, P. aeruginosa, and S. pneumoniae. In addition, S. aureus and S. epidermidis can be discriminated from other species but not each other. The sections of values across the emission range at a given excitation wavelength are the predefined pairs in the inverse matrices Σ⁻¹ in the distance calculations in the processing steps described above. These pairs may for example be excitation at 315 nm and the range of emission values indicated by the circles shown in FIG. 58, i.e., (315/300-450), (315, 485-500), (315/570-580).

Referring to FIG. 59, it is apparent that the emissions at excitation wavelength 415 nm has the ability to discriminate between species. Using selected sections of values across the emission range C. parasilopsis and P. auruginosa can be clearly discriminated from the other species. It is also of interest to note the difference between first derivative values for S. aureus and S. epidermidis that occurs around emission 450 nm. When the information from the selected sections of values across the emission range for wavelengths 315 and 415 (FIGS. 58 and 59) is combined, all of the species in the model can be discriminated from each other at a high rate (>97% reliability).

From the foregoing description, it will be appreciated that we have disclosed a method of identifying and/or characterizing a microbial agent in a sample, comprising the steps of: a) obtaining reference data comprising intrinsic fluorescence measurements from concentrations of a multitude of known microbial agents; b) storing the reference data in a machine readable memory accessible to an automated identification and/or characterization instrument (104) (e.g., in a computer shown in FIG. 50); and c) providing in the instrument (104) (1) a robotic, automated apparatus (e.g., 1910/1916) concentrating a sample containing an unknown microbial agent within a disposable device (1904), (2) a reading unit (1918) capable of obtaining intrinsic fluorescence measurements from the concentrated microbial agent in the disposable device, and (3) a processing unit (computer, see FIG. 50) executing instructions comparing the intrinsic fluorescence measurements obtained from the sample with the reference data and automatically identifying and/or characterizing the unknown microbial agent in the sample. In one embodiment, the method may further include the steps of: d) obtaining second reference data comprising Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) measurements from concentrations of a multitude of known microbial agents; e) storing the second reference data in the machine readable memory; f) including in the reading unit apparatus for performing SERS measurements on the microbial agent; and g) the processing unit executing further instructions comparing the SERS measurements with the second reference data.

IV. Second Embodiment FIGS. 27-46

A second embodiment of the identification system 104 will be described in conjunction with FIGS. 27-46. This embodiment is similar to the first embodiment of FIGS. 1-26 in terms of overall function and operation; the main differences are (1) a different construction of the robotic transfer mechanism 1910; (2) a provision for vortexing of the sample and lysis buffer in the sampling device 1902, and (3) inclusion of optional detection features in the rack holding the specimen containers 500 (see FIG. 28) for detecting microbial growth within the container 500 so that the identification system is intimately combined with a detection system for detecting whether a specimen container is positive for presence of a microbial agent. A few other points of differentiation in the details of the configuration of the second embodiment will also be noted in the following description.

However, the second embodiment, like the first embodiment of FIGS. 1-26, shares the same overall goals and design objectives. That is, the second embodiment of FIGS. 27-46 automates the removal of a test sample from a specimen container (preferably soon after a positive determination has been made), automates lysing of non-microorganism cells in the test sample, automates loading of the lysed sample into a disposable separation device, automates separation and concentration of the microbial agent present in the lysed sample in the separation device, and automates interrogation of the microbial agent to identify and/or characterize the microbial agent.

The culture bottles/specimen containers 500 are loaded into racks or holding structures of the identification instrument 104 either manually or automatically. In an optional configuration; the specimen containers 500 are tested for the presence or microorganisms by a detection subsystem which is incorporated into the racks. In a manual, prior art method, without automation, a technician would remove a bottle from a separate detection instrument after the bottle is deemed “positive”. This could be several hours after the diagnostic determination, especially if the determination is made in the middle of the night or when the lab is understaffed. However, with the automated identification instrument in this embodiment, the steps of automated identification and/or characterization of the microbial agent can proceed immediately, and automatically, after the specimen container is deemed “positive”.

In the case of lytic centrifugation and intrinsic fluorescence measurement, features of both of the illustrated embodiments, it may be desirable that the sample be processed for purposes of identification and/or characterization shortly after a positive call by an associated detection instrument. As the bottle is called positive the microorganisms are in an exponential stage of growth. This growth phase is distinguished from the lag phase and death phase which are both before and after, respectively, the exponential phase. Microorganisms in this exponential phase have different physical and genetic expression characteristics than the lag and death phase.

By automating this process of identification and/or characterization, the technician is removed from the system. Identification and/or characterization of the microbial agent can occur much more rapidly in the present embodiments as compared to prior approaches.

A. System Layout

The identification instrument 104 in accordance with a second embodiment is shown in FIG. 27. The instrument 104 includes a first cassette 1900A containing a plurality of disposable sampling devices 1902 and a second cassette 1900B containing a plurality of disposable separation devices 1904. A rack or holding structure 1906 includes receptacles for holding a multitude of containers 500 containing samples for identification testing. The rack 1906 is shown contained within an insulated incubation enclosure 1812. The enclosure 1812 includes a door 1810 that is opened to expose the bottles 500 and allow venting of the bottles and removal of a test sample via a robotic transfer mechanism 1910, sample removal apparatus 1912, and the sampling device 1902.

The robot transfer mechanism 1910 includes a rotating base and movable joints and segments between the joints so as to allow the robotic transfer mechanism 1910 and in particular gripping structures included in the sample removal apparatus or sampling head 1912 to access the various components in the instrument 104. These components include a separation and concentration device (centrifuge 1916), the cassettes 1900A and 1900B, a vortexer 1814 for mixing a lysis buffer and test sample within the sampling device 1902, a read station 1918, and various containers 1802, 1804, 1806 containing different lysis buffers and/or density cushions in the situation where the lysis buffers and density cushions are added to the sampling device or separation device at the time of use. The robotic transfer mechanism 1910 is able to access each of the bottles 500 and optionally grip and hold the bottles 500. Thus, the robotic transfer mechanism 1910 may optionally be the device to automatically load the bottles 500 into the holding structure or rack 1906. Alternatively, the bottles 500 could be loaded into the rack manually via an access door positioned on the opposite side of the enclosure 1812 from the door 1810. See FIG. 49, door 4902.

In the configuration of FIG. 27, a centrifuge cup holder 1800 holds a small cup-like holder 1801 into which the separation device 1904 is placed (see FIG. 46A); the combination of the separation device 1904 and cup-like holder 1801 are placed into the centrifuge 1916 for separation and concentration of the microbial agent in the separation device 1904. After centrifugation, the cup-like device 1801 is returned to the cup holder 1800. The sample removal apparatus 1912 grips the separation device and the robotic transfer mechanism places it into the reading/identification module 1918. The concentrated microbial agent in the separation device 1904 is interrogated by the reading/identification module 1918. The reading step may include the features described above, such as measuring intrinsic fluorescence spectra of the sample and, with the aid of a computer, comparison of the measured spectra to a data set containing spectra from known microbial agents and classification using a classification algorithm. After reading, the separation device 1904 is placed into a waste container (see FIGS. 1, 15, item 1908).

FIG. 28 is an illustration of an alternative arrangement for the identification instrument 104. In this embodiment, the walls or panels from the incubation enclosure are removed to show one embodiment of the racks 1906 that hold the bottles 500. The racks 1906 are incorporated into a rotating turret which rotates about a vertical axis. Detection instrumentation for noninvasively detecting whether a bottle is positive is incorporated in the racks 1906. These aspects are described in more detail in co-pending application Ser. No. ______, attorney docket no. 01145/MBHB 09-271-E, filed on the same date as this application, the content of which is incorporated by reference herein. Accordingly, in this embodiment the racks 1906 and associated detection instrumentation function as an automated detection system 102 for determining the presence of a microbial agent in a specimen container.

FIG. 29 is another perspective view of the embodiment of FIG. 27, showing the centrifuge 1916, vortexer 1814 and sample removal apparatus 1912 included in the robotic transfer mechanism 1910.

FIG. 30 shows the cassettes 1900A and 1900B of disposables in more detail. While each cassette is shown holding twenty-five disposable sampling devices 1902 or separation devices 1904, the number or arrangement of the devices 1902 and 1904 within a replaceable cassette 1900 is not important.

B. Robot Transfer Mechanism 1910 and Sampling Removal Apparatus 1912

FIG. 31 is a perspective view of the robotic transfer mechanism 1910. The transfer mechanism 1910 is shown in a form of a six-axis robot. The robot includes six rotational joints 1700 indicated by the arrows and segments 1702 between the robot joints that expand or contract linearly in order to extend or contract or otherwise move the position of the sample removal apparatus 1912 placed at the tooling end of the robot arm in three-dimensional space. A rolling diaphragm pump assembly 1710 is fitted to the robot transfer mechanism 1910 to apply vacuum or positive pressure to the sampling device 1902 via a connecting tube 3402 to facilitate venting and sampling the containers 500 as described below. The pneumatic system 1914 (FIG. 1) provides pneumatic controls for the gripping tooling forming the sample removal apparatus 1912.

A six axes robot is chosen to allow for flexibility especially the ability to vent and sample the bottle. A pneumatic gripper 1954, see FIGS. 34 and 35, is placed at the tooling end of the robot on the last rotary joint. Plates attached to the gripper 1954 hold three end effectors; that is, there are three separate gripping components: one 1956 for the sampling device 1902, one 1958 for the separation device 1904 and specimen containers 500, and one (not shown) for a vacuum tube which may be used in future configurations. A connector 1952 is used to attach the free end of the tube 3402 to the fitting 3208 (FIG. 33) on the proximal end of the sampling device 1902. A pneumatically operated linear slide 1950 is moved forward to advance the connector 1952 to engage with the sampling device 1902 and backward to disengage from the sampling device when the device 1902 is deposited in the waste container.

The gripper 1954 and linear slide 1950 are pneumatic driven, with the gripper and linear slide controlled from the same air line (3602 FIG. 36). Flow control valves (not shown) control the rate movement on the gripper and linear slide. When the sampling device 1902 is to be picked up, the gripping component 1956 is positioned around the sampling device 1902 with the component 1956 open and the linear slide 1950 retracted. An air valve (not shown) is activated to close the gripper 1954 and close the gripping component 1956 and advance the linear slide 1950. Through flow controls, the gripper closes first, grabbing the sampling device 1902. Shortly after, the linear slide 1950 advances and engages the connector (1952 in FIG. 34) with the sampling device 1902. Tubing 3402 connects the pump assembly 1710 with the connector 1952 in FIG. 34 and sampling device 1902, thereby establishing a connection from the sampling device 1902 to the pump 1710 (FIG. 36) via the tubing 3402.

C. Sampling Device 1902

The sampling device 1902 in this embodiment is shown in FIGS. 32 and 33. The operation of the device 1902 for venting and sampling a specimen container 500 is described below in conjunction with FIGS. 36 and 37. The operation of the device 1902 for injecting the sample into the separation device 1904 is described below in conjunction with FIGS. 43-46.

Referring now to FIGS. 32 and 33, the sampling device 1902 includes a 18-gauge needle 202 having a rubber sheath 3214. A luer fitting 3212 connects the needle 3202 to a 5 ml syringe body or tube 3200. A 0.2 μm hydrophobic filter 3218 is coupled to the syringe body 3200 with an elastomeric fitting 3210. A port or fitting 3208 receives the tube 3402 (FIG. 34) which is connected to the rolling diaphragm pump 1710 fitted on the robot transfer mechanism 1910 of FIG. 31.

The sheath 3214 has four functions: 1) sheath the needle 3202 to avoid needle stick injuries, 2) keep needle 3202 sterile, 3) prevent leaking of components out of tube 3200, and 4) act as spring to push back on components during sampling from the specimen container 500 and the injection of the separation device 1904 (see FIGS. 44 and 45). The sheath prevents the needle 3202 from sticking or binding to a septum or stopper fitted on the end of the specimen container 500. As the needle is withdrawn from the septum the rubber sheath pushes against the septum preventing the binding of the needle and septum. Similarly, during injection of the separation device the spring-like compression of the sheath 3214 pushes against the screw cap of the separation device 1904 and prevents the needle for sticking or binding to the cap.

The hydrophobic filter 3218 (FIG. 33) prevents microbes from contaminating the pumping system and tubing. Since this filter is hydrophobic, liquid is prevented from passing to the pump 1710 of FIG. 31. Another function of the filter besides preventing contamination, is repeatable fluid withdrawal. Once liquid touches the filter 3218 no more air can be evacuated from the tube 3200 since the water blocks the flow of air. Thus, the pump 1710 can continue pumping but the volume Of liquid extracted will be a function of the tubing volume and not the precision of the pump.

D. Vacuum Pump Assembly 1710

The vacuum pump assembly 1710 of FIG. 31 is shown isolated in perspective view in FIG. 36. The pump 1710 contains a rolling diaphragm 1712 connected to a linear actuator 1714. Solenoid valves 1716 and 1718 switch the pump from input to output. During the venting step, in which the bottles 500 are vented to atmosphere using the sampling device 1902, the solenoid valves 1716 and 1718 are actuated to let positive pressure vent through the system (input). Also, during sampling the pump draws in fluid from the bottle 500 into the sampling device 1902. The fluid is ejected (output) to the separator device 1904 (FIGS. 43-44). For both input and output modes, the linear actuator 1714 continues to operate, moving the rolling diaphragm 1712 back and forth. Check valves (not shown in FIG. 36) take part in controlling the direction of the fluid.

E. Venting and Sampling

The venting and sampling steps are shown in FIGS. 37 and 38. The robot 1910 first picks up one of the sampling devices 1902 from the cassette 1900A. The robot 1910 moves into the position shown in FIG. 37. The door 1810 is opened. The racks 1816 of FIG. 37 are rotated to an upwards pointing position and venting occurs by means of inserting the needle of the sampling device 1902 into the specimen containers 500. The racks 1816 are then rotated to a downward pointing position shown in FIG. 37 and the pump 1710 operated to draw a small a test sample (e.g., 0.5 to 1.0 ml) from the specimen container 500 into the sampling device 1902. The sampling device 1902 is either pre-loaded with lytic agent or alternatively the lytic agent is added to the sampling 1902 prior to the venting and sampling steps. In the case where the sampling device is loaded with lytic agent in-situ, the robotic transfer mechanism grasps one of the sampling devices, accesses lytic agent solutions stored in containers 1802, 1804, 1806 etc., see FIG. 27, and withdraws 1.0 to 2.0 ml of lytic agent into the sampling device 1902 and then proceeds with the venting and sampling steps.

F. Mixing of Lytic agent and Sample in Sampling Device 1902

As noted previously, the embodiment of FIGS. 27-46 includes features for agitating the sampling device 1902 in order to mix the test sample withdrawn from the specimen container with the lytic agent present in the sampling device 1902, e.g., by means of vortexing.

The vortexing will now be described in conjunction with FIGS. 29, and 39-42, showing the vortexer 1814. A unique feature of this system is a vortex cup 3900 which holds the sampling device 1902. The robotic transfer mechanism 1910 first places the sampling device 1902 in the vortex cup 3900 (see FIG. 39), releases the sampling device 1902, and then moves upward into the position shown in FIG. 40. The robot gripper fingers 3450 then closes loosely around the above the hydrophobic filter 3218 (FIGS. 32, 33) of the sampling device 1902. The sampling device 1902 is held loosely in the vortexer cup 3900 so that the vortexer 1814 can be free to agitate the sampling device 1902. If it is held tightly the vortexer 1814 is not free to agitate the sample/lysis buffer mixture which is present in the sampling device 1902. The bottom surface 1957 of the gripper tooling 1956 retains the sampling device 1902 in the vortexer 1814 during vortexing.

The vortexer 1814 includes a base 3902 that the cup or holder 3900 is mounted to as via fasteners extending through holes 4202 in the flange 4204 of the holder 3900 as shown in FIGS. 41-42. The interior channel 4200 of the holder 3900 is sized to fit the sampling device 1902 as shown in FIGS. 40 and 41. The vortexing sufficiently mixes the sample and the lysis buffer with a 5 second cycle at 3000 rpm.

In one optional configuration, the vortex cup 3900 include heating elements to maintain the sample in the sampling device 1902 at 37 degrees C. The heating may take the form of a coil resistive heater 3910 shown in FIG. 39A. The agitation frequency, duration and temperature of the vortex process may change for particular samples and buffers.

G. Injection of Mixed Sample into Separation Device 1904

It may be desirable to first load the separation device into the centrifuge to pre-spin the lytic buffer and insure no trapped air is present in the capillary tube of the separation device. Also, if the optics system is configured in the centrifuge a quality check (e.g., a pre-read of the separation device before adding lysed sample) can be performed. Quality control checks could include inspection for debris or fibers that may be present in the separation device, scratches to the optic surfaces, or other optic defects.

After the vortexer 1814 completes the mixing of the sample and lysis buffer in the sampling device 1902, an approximately 1 ml portion of the mixed sample and lysis solution (lysed sample) is then injected into the disposable separation device 1904. This operation may occur while the separation device 1904 is still contained within the cassette 1900B of FIGS. 26 and 27. The mixed sample and lysis buffer is shown as mixture 4302 in FIG. 43A. (FIG. 43D shows the rubber sheath 3214 shown partially removed from the needle 3202 but this is only to better illustrate the sheath and the needle; the needle is covered by the sheath during use as shown in FIGS. 43B and 43C).

To accomplish the injection of the sample into the separation device 1902, the robotic transfer mechanism positions the (loaded) sampling device 1902 over one of the separation devices 1904 as shown in FIG. 43A and then proceeds to lower the sampling device 1902 so that the needle 3202 is forced through both the rubber sheath 3214 and the septum 4300 provided in the cap 2404 of the separation device 1904 so as to place the tip of the needle 3202 into the interior chamber 2602 of the separation device. See FIGS. 44, 45 and 46. This action compresses the rubber sheath 3214 as shown in FIGS. 44, 45 and 46, with the sheath 3214 acting on a spring and applying force to the cap 2404. As shown in FIG. 46, the roller diaphragm pump 1710 operates to pump air into the sampling device 1902, creating positive pressure in the interior of the sampling device and thereby forcing the test sample/lysis buffer mixture 4302 to be injected via the needle into the separation device 1904 as shown in FIG. 46. The mixture 4302 is dispensed on top of the 1.0 ml density cushion 2802 already present in the separation device 1904.

H. Transfer of Loaded Separation Device 1904 into Centrifuge 1916

After loading of the separation device 3202 in this manner, the robotic transfer mechanism 1910 proceeds to transfer the sampling device 1902 to a waste container, and then pick up the loaded separation device 1904 and place it in the cup 1801 held by the cup holder 1800 (FIG. 28, FIG. 46A-46C). Then, the combination of the cup 1801 and separation device 1904 is picked up and lifted off the holder 1800 (FIG. 46A) by the robotic transfer mechanism 1910 and placed in the centrifuge 1916 (FIG. 28) for separation and concentration of the sample in the separation device 1904.

In one possible embodiment, the centrifuge 1916 is not an indexed centrifuge, i.e., it does not come to the exact same position after spinning. The centrifuge lid is open and closed by a pneumatic cylinder. The position of the centrifuge is found by a camera (not shown) on the robot transfer mechanism 1910. A picture of the centrifuge is taken and machine vision software determines the position of the centrifuge so that the separation device 1902 can be correctly placed in the centrifuge. In particular, the camera looks for a fiduciary mark on the rotor and the robot moves to the appropriate position in the centrifuge rotor. The separation device 1904 is inserted into the proper location to maintain balance in the centrifuge 1916.

The centrifuge could be configured to just spin one separation device at a time (as in the case of the first embodiment), or multiple devices at a time as shown in FIGS. 27-29.

The machine vision component (camera) could be eliminated by using an indexed centrifuge rotor. In this configuration, the centrifuge rotor would stop at the same position after centrifugation. This could be accomplished by using a mechanical clutch to engage the rotor and moving it past an optical sensor to the correct position. This method could eliminate complexities (e.g. lighting, complex software algorithms) and costs associated with machine vision, and thus for some implementations may be preferred.

I. Separation and Concentration of Microbial Agent in Separation Device 1904

The centrifuge operates to spin the separation device 1902 at high revolutions per minute for sufficient time to concentrate the microbiological specimen within the separation device into a pellet or pellet-like mass, as described in conjunction with the first embodiment, e.g., 10,000 g for 2 minutes. During centrifugation the lysed red blood cells separate to the top of the density cushion and the intact microbes form a pellet at the bottom of the 1 mm capillary tube 2604 in the separation device 1902 (see FIG. 43A). The centrifuge lid is opened using a pneumatic cylinder and the robot removes the separation device 1902 and cup 1801. The position of the capillary tube and holder is determined by machine vision as in the placement step above. The separation device 1902 and cup 1801 are removed as a unit from the centrifuge 1918 and placed on the cup holder 1800 (using pin 1805 as a locating mechanism, see FIG. 46C), and then the robot 1910 picks up the separation device 1902 and moves it to the reading unit 1918.

J. Reading of Concentrated Microbial Agent in Separation Device 1904

The reading unit 1918 interrogates the concentrated microbial agent forming the pellet within the separation device 1902 in the manner described at length above. The results (characterization and/or identification information for the microbial agent) are output to the user interface of the instrument, a connected workstation, a printer, or other output device depending on the configuration of the instrument.

K. Sterilization of Specimen Container 500 Stopper

In some biological applications for the present instrument 104, the specimen container 500 is inoculated with a specimen sample such as human body fluids or other normally-sterile body fluids. This is accomplish by injecting the specimen sample via a needle through a stopper formed at the top of the container 500. There is a chance that the sample may contain biohazardous material. Often a small drop of the specimen sample, such as blood, may be left on the surface of the stopper. It is desirable to sterilize this surface before sampling and processing to avoid contamination of the container 500 with airborne or surface microbes.

Several methods could be developed to sterilize this surface in an automated manner These include:

1) UV sterilization of the stopper surface. Ultraviolet light is a standard method of sterilizing surfaces. Automation could be accomplished by attaching a UV light source to a second robot or automation mechanism provided in the instrument that would move to the stopper surface for sterilization before venting the bottle or removing a test sample.

2) Misting the surface with a disinfectant such as isopropyl alcohol or other chemical and then wiping the surface clear. Presently this is the most common manual method of sterilizing inoculation sites. Normally, swabs are soaked in a disinfectant and a technician wipes the surface before inoculating the bottle or removing a sample. Mechanical wiping is necessary in the case of dried blood spots on the surface since a chemical mist may not penetrate through the blood. The misting of the surface can be automated by pressurizing a disinfectant reservoir with air and spraying this onto the surface of the stopper. The mechanical wipe can be accomplished by picking up a swab or fabric wipe and wiping the stopper surface. Other mechanical methods of wiping the surface include a rolling fabric soaked in the disinfectant. Again, these methods could be accomplished by means of a separate robotic mechanism in the instrument 104, or by providing the existing robot transfer mechanism 1910 with additional gripping/wiping/misting/UV sterilization components as the case may be.

L. Other Configurations for Robotic Transfer Mechanism 1910

While the second embodiment shown in FIGS. 27-29 uses a six-axes robot for the automation robot transfer mechanism 1910 to accomplish transfer and positioning of components or materials in the instrument, it is but one of a variety of choices that could be made and the scope of the present disclosure is intended to encompass other robotic transfer mechanisms. A multi-axis robot arm was chosen because it is flexible. New automation steps can be easily programmed without requiring major mechanical tooling redesigns. Once the process is established, the robot could be replaced by a simpler and more compact robot, with fewer axes, or a Cartesian (x,y,z) automation system. The Cartesian system would be more inexpensive than the six-axes robot. A Cartesian system is used for example in the first embodiment (see FIG. 5).

M. Electric Actuators

A few of the actuators of the second embodiment (and in particular the gripper and slide aspects of the sample removal apparatus 1912) are operated by pneumatics (compressed air). Pneumatic mechanisms are simple to program and design, however they are not amenable to clinical or some laboratory settings where compressed air is not available. These actuators can be replaced by electrical/mechanical systems such as linear drives, stepper and servo motor connected to linear drives and solenoids.

N. Alternative Mixing Methods

In the second embodiment, a vortexer 1814 is used to vigorously mix the sample and lytic buffer. A different mixing method such as sonication or reciprocal mixing could be used in place of vortexing.

O. Other Applications for Identification System

We have described in detail a method and instrument for automatically vent and sample a specimen container, e.g., blood culture bottle. The sample is lysed and centrifuged to process the microbial agent present in the sample for further analysis. The features of the instrument can be applicable to other diagnostic systems and other types of culture bottles. These systems could include molecular biology tests or automated culture bottles for industrial samples. Industrial samples could include sterility testing of drugs or food.

In the case of molecular biology tests it may be very important to perform a microbial test during exponential growth of a microorganism. During the exponential growth phase the genetic expression of microbes is different than during the lag phase. In the lag phase, which is prior to the exponential growth phase, microbes are converting their genetic machinery to express proteins to consume the media nutrients which may be different from their previous environment. As the microbes enter exponential phase the genetic expression has become set.

An automated detection instrument (102), such as that described here and in our prior provisional application or the BacT/ALERT system, can determine when the microbes begin exponential phase and the automated identification method above can process a sample soon after exponential phase begins. In a manual culture method it would be difficult to determine when exactly the microbes enter into exponential phase since this would entail checking the bottles frequently for turbidity. Should the beginning of the exponential phase be missed by the technician, there is a risk that microbes would pass into death phase as the limited nutrients are consumed. Hence, in preferred embodiments the present identification instrument automatically processes the positive specimen containers soon or immediately after the container is deemed “positive.”

In some other non-clinical embodiments of the identification system, the lysis step is optional or not preformed. Hence, the provision of a lytic buffer in the sampling device and vortexing the sampling device are not required in every possible configuration of the present inventive instrument.

P. Re-Sampling of Specimen Containers

The process of venting, sampling, separation and interrogation described above can be repeated on the same specimen container 500 as needed. In one possible variation, a given specimen container 500 is sampled successively using sampling devices 1902 loaded with different lytic buffers (e.g., loaded in situ from the supply of lytic buffers in the instrument) and loaded into different separation devices 1904 which are then subject to separation and concentration steps and then reading.

The instrument 104 may also perform identification and/or characterization testing without first performing the detection step; possibly shortening the time to identification. This mode of operation could be employed when other clinical data are available that are predictive of infection. Patient condition, biomarkers (e.g., PCT) etc. are examples of data that could be predictive of infection. In this mode, specimen containers are loaded into the identification instrument 104 (e.g., using the rack designs of either embodiment), the bottles are incubated in racks provided in the identification instrument, and every bottle is periodically sampled and subject to the separation and concentration step and the interrogation step. If a given sample is not able to be identified or characterized at the first iteration, the specimen container can be re-sampled, e.g., every 30 minutes, until sufficient microbial agent growth has occurred within the specimen container such that the reading step for that subsequent iteration returns an identification and/or characterization result. Incubation of the specimen container occurs prior to and during the sequential sampling of the specimen container.

Q. Coupling to Automated Detection Instrument.

In some embodiments, the automated identification instrument 104 of the first and second embodiments is tightly coupled to an automated detection instrument configured to determine whether a specimen container 500 is positive for presence of a microbial agent. This tight coupling preferably provides for automated hand-off of positive specimen containers 500 from a detection instrument to the automated identification instrument 104 as soon as the specimen container is tested “positive.”

A variety of instrument configurations for achieving such coupling are described in our prior U.S. provisional application Ser. 61/216,339 filed May 15, 2009. A few options are shown in FIGS. 47 and 48. In FIG. 47, an automated detection instrument 102 is linked via conveyer 4702 to the automated identification and/or characterization instrument 104. Bottles arriving at the automated identification and/or characterization instrument 104 are picked up by the robotic transfer mechanism 1910 and loaded into the racks. In FIG. 48, the bottles are provided to a combined detection and automated identification and characterization instrument (e.g., as set forth above for the second embodiment, see FIG. 28 and the above discussion). In this configuration, the racks holding the incoming specimen containers 500 include detection instrumentation for interrogating colorimetric sensors incorporated in the bottom of the bottles. Further, the combined instrument 102+104 is provided with incubation features, such as providing the incubation enclosure 1812 of FIGS. 27 and 37.

Still other configurations are possible, as describe in the co-pending application Ser. No. ______ filed on the same date as this application, attorney docket no. 09-271-US. FIG. 49 shows an embodiment in which the combined instrument 102+104 includes a door 4902 for manual loading of bottles into the racks of the combined detection and identification/characterization instrument.

In the embodiments of FIG. 47-49, a drawer 4702 is provided to provide access to remove waste from the instrument, e.g., specimen containers, sampling devices and separation devices.

The physical configuration of the external panels for the instruments of FIGS. 47-49 are not particularly important and can vary widely. The instruments include a graphical user interface and display 4704 which can also vary widely.

R. Computer System Schematic

FIG. 50 is schematic block diagram showing the identification and/or characterization instrument 104 and its associated computer control system. The details shown in FIG. 50 can vary widely and are not particularly important, and therefore are provided here by way of example and not limitation.

A computer 4902 running LabVIEW (National Instruments) is connected to two computers: (1) a computer 4904 via a serial connection, and (2) a robot control computer 4906 via an Ethernet connection. The computer 4904 controls the racks 1906 and associated detection subsystem for detecting whether bottles are positive, controls the stepper motors which agitates (oscillates) the rack 1906 to provide agitation during incubation via a motion controller 4908. A stepper motor (not shown) allows for the rack to be precisely put in position for venting and sampling by the robot transfer mechanism 1910.

The LabVIEW 4902 computer queries the computer 4904 for positive bottles. The computer 4904 computer replies through the serial connection and the bottle ID, time of positive and bottle position are parsed by the LabVIEW computer 4902. The bottle position is sent to the robot controller 4906 which opens the door to the racks (FIG. 27, 1810) through a digital signal to a relay controlling pneumatic cylinders connected to the door. The robot 1910 acquires a sampling device 1902 and vents the bottle and samples as described above.

A digital signal from the robot controller 4906 is sent to relays to open and close the lid of the centrifuge 1916, start the centrifuge 1916 and control the vortexer 1816. Motion control of the linear actuator on the rolling diaphragm pump is controlled by the LabVIEW computer 4902 via a motion controller 4908.

Intrinsic fluorescence measurement captured by the identification module 1918 are sent to the LabVIEW computer 4902. The computer 4902 compares the measured spectra with stored reference spectra from known samples to identify and/or characterize the microbial agent in the sample as described above. To do this comparison, the computer 4902 includes a memory (e.g., hard disk) containing the reference spectra data and machine-readable code storing software instructions to perform the comparison, e.g., the algorithms described previously. The computer 4902 includes a conventional central processing unit which operates on the acquired data and stored reference data using the algorithm(s) to generate a result for the sample under test and provides a report e.g., via a user interface on the instrument or attached peripherals 4910. The computer 4902 can communicate over an Internet Protocol network 4914 with other remotely located computers 4912, e.g., to share identification and/or characterization results, store the results in a remote database, or interface to other laboratory information systems.

S. Combination of Separation and Sampling Devices into a Single Disposable Device.

As described previously, the identification and/or characterization instrument 104 includes a sample removal apparatus 1912 which holds or grasps a disposable sampling device 1902. Together, they operate to remove a portion of the biological sample in the positive detection container 500 (test sample) and add the portion to a separation device 1904. The functions of separation and sampling could be performed in a single disposable device.

Referring to FIGS. 60-64, a separation device 6000 includes a body 6002, generally in the shape of a block, a top plate 6004 and a base plate 6006. The body contains an optical window used for intrinsic fluorescence measurements; the material forming the window optically clear and non-fluorescing. In general, the body 6002 can be molded or otherwise formed from any known plastic material known in the art. As shown in FIGS. 62-64, the body 6002 of the separation device 6000 encloses a lytic chamber 6020, a venting channel 6030, a fluid transfer channel 6034 and a separation chamber 6040. The lytic chamber 6020 and separation chamber 6040 are orientated along two parallel and adjacent vertical axes 6022, 6042, defined in the body 6002, each chamber having top and bottom terminal ends. The venting channel 6030 provides a first fluid communication channel connecting the bottom end of the lytic chamber to a vent or pump port 6018 in the top plate 6004. As shown in FIGS. 63-64, the first fluid communication channel further comprises a venting fluid flow groove 6032 contained in the upper surface 6034 of the body 6002 and providing fluid communication between the lytic chamber 6020 and the venting channel 6030. The fluid transfer channel 6036 provides a second fluid communication channel connecting the bottom end of the lytic chamber 6020 to the top end of the separation chamber 6040 for transferring a lytic buffer and sample from the lytic chamber 6020 to the separation chamber 6040. As shown in FIGS. 63 and 65, the second fluid communication channel further comprises a venting fluid flow groove 6038 contained in the upper surface 6034 of the body 6002 and providing fluid communication between the lytic chamber 6020 and the separation chamber 6040. The lytic chamber 6020, venting channel 6030 and fluid transfer channel 6036 are open to a bottom surface 6010 of the body 6002 of the device 6000, as shown in FIG. 61. The bottom surface 6010 of the body 6002 may further comprise a lower fluid flow groove 6024 providing fluid communication between the bottom of the lytic chamber 6020 and the venting channel 6030 and fluid transfer channel 6036 through a valve well 6026 (described further below). The top plate 6004 and base plate 6006 can be attached to the body 6002 by any known means in the art to close of or otherwise seal the chambers 6020, 6040 and channels 6030, 6034. For example, the top plate 6004 and/or base plate 6006 can be affixed to the body by welding or by the use of an adhesive.

As shown in FIG. 61, the separation device 6000 includes a valve 6012 and a valve actuator port 6008 that runs through the top plate 6004. The valve 6012 is contained within a valve well 6026 in the bottom surface 6010 of the body 6002, and is operable between a first position and a second position via an external actuator (not shown). When the valve 6012 is in a first position, a first fluid communication channel is “open” from the bottom of the lytic chamber 6020 through the venting channel 6030 to the vent or pump port 6018. This open first fluid communication channel is operable to vent excess pressure from the device 6000 or to provide a vacuum to the lytic chamber 6020 through the use of a pump (not shown). When the valve 6012 is in a second position, a second fluid communication channel is “open” from the bottom of the lytic chamber 6020 through the fluid transfer channel 6036 to the separation chamber 6040. This open second fluid communication channel is operable for transferring the lytic buffer and sample from the lytic chamber 6020 to the separation chamber 6040. As shown in FIG. 62, the vent or pump port 6018 and sample entry port 6016 comprise open channels through the top plate 6004. In one possible embodiment, the sample entry port 6016 further comprises a pierceable septum (not shown). In another embodiment, a syringe needle (not shown) can be attached or affixed to the sample entry port 6016, thereby allowing the lytic and separation device to operate as the sampling device for directly obtaining a sample from a specimen container 500.

As shown in FIG. 63, the separation chamber 6040 may further comprise an upper reservoir, a middle tapered section and a lower capillary tube 6048 all arranged around a central vertical axis. As shown, the middle tapered section connects the wider diameter upper reservoir and the smaller diameter capillary tube 6048. In one embodiment, the bottom wall of the capillary tube 6048 is made of an optically transparent material for facilitating optical interrogation of a concentrated microbial agent (not shown) located at the bottom of the capillary tube 6048. In another embodiment, the separation device 6000 is made of an optically transparent material to facilitate optical interrogation of a concentrated microbial agent (not shown) located at the bottom of the capillary tube 6048. As shown, the bottom wall opposite the capillary tube 6048 may be of a reduced thickness to facilitate optical interrogation as indicated in FIG. 62. In yet another embodiment, optical interrogation can occur from the side of the device 6000. In accordance with this embodiment, the block will comprise a notch section 6010 and a reduced thickness side wall juxtaposed the capillary tube 6048. In accordance with this embodiment, the separation device 6000 is made of an optically transparent material to facilitate optical interrogation of a concentrated microbial agent (not shown) located at the bottom of the capillary tube 6048.

In operation, the lytic chamber 6020 can be loaded with a lysis buffer and a sample taken from a positive culture container. For example, a sampling device 1902, as described elsewhere herein, can be used to deposit separately or in combination a lysis buffer and a sample from a positive culture container into the lytic chamber 6020. In another embodiment, the lysis buffer can be added to the lytic chamber 6020 of the separation device 6000 within the characterization/identification subsystem. For example, the sampling device 1902 can be used to obtain an aliquot of lysis buffer (e.g., from a lysis buffer reservoir) that can be subsequently deposited into the lytic chamber 6020 through the sample entry port 6016 (e.g., a pierceable septum) in the body 6002. Next, the sampling device 1902 can be used to obtain a sample from a positive specimen container 500 and deposit that sample into the lytic chamber 6020 through the lytic chamber port 6016. The lysis buffer and sample are then mixed within the lytic chamber 6020, e.g., by agitation and/or vortexing of the sampling device 6000. The selective lysis step is allowed to proceed for a sufficient time to allow the lysis reaction to be substantially completed (e.g., from 1 to 5 minutes). This selective lysis step selectively lyses undesired cells (i.e., non-microorganism cells) that may be present in the sample, e.g., blood cells and/or tissue cells. In another embodiment, the lytic chamber 6020 can be pre-loaded with a lysis buffer and the sample loaded to the lytic chamber prior to agitation and/or vortexing. In one embodiment, the sampling device 6000 can optionally be incubated to allow the selective lysis step to proceed more quickly.

After the lysis step, the lysed sample and lysis buffer can be transferred to the separation chamber 6040 through the a fluid flow channel 6030 for the separation of any microorganisms over a pre-loaded a density cushion, as described herein. The valve 6012 is pressed down externally by a mechanical actuator (not shown), thereby opening the fluid flow channel 6030 between the lytic chamber 6020 and the separation chamber 6040. A pump above the separation chamber 6040 draws the mixture through the fluid flow channel 6030 to the top of the separation chamber 6040. In one embodiment, by holding the separation device 6000 at an angle, the fluid can flow gently down the interior wall of the separation chamber 6040 and onto the density gradient.

The identification/characterization instrument 104 further includes a separation and/or concentration station, optionally in the form of a centrifuge, which operates on the separation device 6000 so as to separate the microbial agent from other products in the portion of the biological sample and concentrate the microbial agent within the separation device 6000. In one example, the microbial agent is concentrated in the form of a pellet or pellet-like mass in the bottom of the capillary tube 6060 of the separation device 6000.

The identification/characterization instrument further includes a identification and/or characterization module or read station (see, e.g., FIG. 1, 1918) which interrogates the concentrated microbial agent to identify and/or characterize the microbial agent.

Another embodiment having a stacked chamber design is shown in FIGS. 68-78B.

FIGS. 65-69 illustrate a combined sampling and separation device 6100. As shown in FIGS. 65-65 and 68, the combined sampling and separation device 6100 includes an upper housing 6102, a lower housing 6104, and a flexible pinch valve 6108 connecting the upper housing 6102 and lower housing 6104. As shown in FIGS. 66 and 67, the upper housing encloses an upper lytic chamber 6120, the lower housing encloses a lower separation chamber 6140, and the flexible pinch valve 6108 defines a fluid transfer channel 6130 therethrough. The upper lytic chamber 6120, fluid transfer channel 6130 and lower separation chamber 6140 can be orientated around a central axis 6122.

The combined sampling and separation device 6100 further includes a pair of opposable compression tabs 6110, a valve actuator block 6106 and opposable actuator arms 6118 operable to “open” and “close” the flexible pinch valve 6110. In operation, the valve actuator block 6106 can be moved in a first direction (e.g., towards the compression tabs 6110, as represented by arrow 6107) to “open” the valve 6100. By moving the actuator block 6106 towards the compression tabs 6110 the actuator arms 6118 push up the compression tabs 6110 moving the compression tabs 6110 away from the flexible pinch valve thereby open the valve 6108. In the open position, the fluid flow channel 6130 is opened allowing fluid communication between the upper lytic chamber 6120 and the lower separation chamber 6140 (as shown in FIG. 67). The valve actuator block 6106 can also be moved in a second direction (e.g., away from the compression tabs 6110, as represented by arrow 6109) to “close” the valve 6108. When the actuator block 6106 is moved away from the compression tabs 6110 the actuator arms 6118 move the pair of opposable compression tabs 6110 to a “closed” position, thereby pinching closed the flexible pinch valve 6108 (as shown in FIG. 69).

As shown in FIGS. 65-66 and 68, the combined sampling and separation device 6100 also includes a syringe needle 6112 for obtaining a sample from a specimen container, and a vacuum port 6114 for pulling a vacuum within the lytic chamber 6120, thereby assisting with loading of the device 6100. Optionally the syringe may further comprise a sheath (not shown) to protect the syringe needle from damage and/or contamination. Also, as shown in FIGS. 65-66 and 68, the combined sampling and separation device 6100 includes a vacuum port 6114. The vacuum port will include a gas permeable filter or hydrophobic membrane 6116 that allows gases to pass but prevents contamination. In operation, the vacuum port can be connected to a pump (not shown) that can apply a vacuum to the sampling and separation device 6100 for the uptake of a sample from a positive specimen container.

As shown in FIGS. 67 and 69, the separation chamber 6140 includes an upper reservoir 6142, a middle tapered section 6144 and a lower capillary tube 6146 all arranged around axis 6122 below the lytic chamber 6120. As shown, the middle tapered section 6144 connects the wider diameter upper reservoir 6142 and the smaller diameter capillary tube 6146. In one embodiment, the bottom wall 6150 of the capillary tube 6146 is made of an optically transparent material for facilitating optical interrogation of a concentrated microbial agent (not shown) located at the bottom of the capillary tube 6146. In another embodiment, the separation device 6100 is made of an optically transparent material to facilitate optical interrogation of a concentrated microbial agent (not shown) located at the bottom of the capillary tube 6146. As shown, the bottom wall 6150 opposite the capillary tube 6146 may be of a reduced thickness to facilitate optical interrogation as indicated in FIGS. 67 and 79.

In operation, with the flexible pinch valve 6108 in the closed position, the lytic chamber 6120 can be loaded with a lysis buffer and a sample taken from a positive culture container. In one embodiment, the lysis buffer can be added to the lytic chamber 6120 of the separation device 6100 using the syringe needle 6112. For example, the syringe needle 6112 can be used to obtain an aliquot of lysis buffer (e.g., from a lysis buffer reservoir), depositing the lysis buffer into the lytic chamber 6120. Next, the syringe needle 6112 can be used to obtain a sample from a positive specimen container 500, depositing that sample into the lytic chamber 6120. The lysis buffer and sample are then mixed within the lytic chamber 6120, e.g., by agitation and/or vortexing of the sampling device 6100. The selective lysis step is allowed to proceed for a sufficient time to allow the lysis reaction to be substantially completed (e.g., from 1 to 5 minutes). This selective lysis step selectively lyses undesired cells (i.e., non-microorganism cells) that may be present in the sample, e.g., blood cells and/or tissue cells. In another embodiment, the lytic chamber 6120 can be pre-loaded with a lysis buffer and the sample loaded to the lytic chamber prior to agitation and/or vortexing. In still another embodiment, the sampling device 6100 can optionally be incubated to allow the selective lysis step to proceed more quickly.

After the lysis step, the lysed sample and lysis buffer can be transferred to the separation chamber 6140 through the a fluid flow channel 6130 for the separation of any microorganisms over a pre-loaded a density cushion, as described herein. To transfer the lysed sample and lysis buffer to the separation chamber 6140, the pair of opposable compression tabs 6110 are moved to the open position, thereby opening the flexible pinch valve 6108 and allowing fluid communication between the lytic chamber 6120 and the separation chamber 6140 through the fluid flow channel 6130. With the flexible valve 6108 in the open position, the lysed sample and lysis buffer will flow via gravity through the fluid flow channel 6130 and onto the density cushion (not shown) contained in the separation chamber 6140. In one embodiment, by holding the separation device 6100 at an angle, the fluid can flow gently down the interior wall of the separation chamber 6140 and onto the density gradient.

The identification/characterization instrument 104 further includes a separation and/or concentration station, optionally in the form of a centrifuge, which operates on the separation device 6100 so as to separate the microbial agent from other products in the portion of the biological sample and concentrate the microbial agent within the separation device 6100. In one example, the microbial agent is concentrated in the form of a pellet or pellet-like mass in the bottom of the capillary tube 6160 of the separation device 6100.

The identification/characterization instrument further includes a identification and/or characterization module or read station (see, e.g., FIG. 1, 1918) which interrogates the concentrated microbial agent to identify and/or characterize the microbial agent as described previously.

Another embodiment of the combined sampling and separation device 6300 is shown in FIGS. 70-72. Like the combined sampling and separation device shown in FIGS. 65-69, the combined sampling and separation device 6300 includes an upper housing 6302 enclosing a lytic chamber 6320, a lower housing 6104 enclosing a separation chamber 6340, and a flexible pinch valve 6308 defining therethrough a fluid transfer channel 6130.

The combined sampling and separation device 6300 further comprises a pair of opposable compression tabs 6310, a valve actuator block 6306 and opposable actuator arms 6318 operable to “open” and “close” the flexible pinch valve 6308. In operation, the valve actuator block 6306 can be moved in a first direction (e.g., towards the compression tabs 6310, as represented by arrow 6307) to “open” the valve 6308. By moving the actuator block 6306 towards the compression tabs 6310 the actuator arms 6318 push up the compression tabs 6310 moving the compression tabs 6310 away from the flexible pinch valve thereby open the valve 6308. In the open position, the fluid flow channel 6330 is opened allowing fluid communication between the upper lytic chamber 6320 and the lower separation chamber 6140 (as shown in FIG. 71). The valve actuator block 6306 can also be moved in a second direction (e.g., away from the compression tabs 6306) to “close” the valve 6308. When the actuator block 6306 is moved away from the compression tabs 6310 the actuator arms 6318 move the pair of opposable compression tabs 6310 to a “closed” position, thereby pinching closed the flexible pinch valve 6308 (not shown).

As shown in FIGS. 70-72, the combined sampling and separation device 6300 also comprises a syringe needle 6312 for obtaining a sample from a positive specimen container, a valve port 6314 for pulling a vacuum within the lytic chamber 6320, thereby assisting with loading of the device 6300. Optionally the syringe may further comprise a sheath (not shown) to protect the syringe needle from damage and/or contamination. The vacuum port will include a gas permeable filter or hydrophobic membrane 6116 that allows gases to pass but prevents contamination. The combined sampling and separation device further comprises a vacuum chamber, which is optionally pre-charged with a vacuum and operable connected to the sampling and separation device 6300 via a valve 6360 to apply a vacuum to the sampling and separation device 6300 for the uptake of a sample from a positive specimen container.

Referring to FIG. 72, the valve mechanism 6360 of this embodiment comprises a pump port 6370 that allows a pump (not shown) to operate the plunger 6380 between a vacuum position and a venting position. The valve 6360 further comprises an interior chamber 6374, a vacuum port 6376, and a venting port 6378. In operation, the pump (not shown) can move the plunger to a first position or a vacuum position (as shown in FIG. 74) thereby opening a fluid communication channel from said valve port 6372, through the interior chamber 6374 and through the vacuum port 6376 to the vacuum chamber 6362. In the first position or vacuum position, the valve 6360 allows a vacuum to be applied to the sampling and separation device 6300, thereby controlling the uptake of a sample from positive specimen container. The plunger 6380 can also be moved to a second position or venting position thereby opening a fluid communication channel from said valve port 6372, through the interior chamber 6374 and through the vacuum port 6378, thereby allowing the sampling and separation device to vent a specimen container prior to the uptake of a sample via the vacuum.

As shown in FIG. 71, the separation chamber 6340 may further comprise an upper reservoir 6342, a middle tapered section 6344 and a lower capillary tube 6346 all arranged around axis 6322 below the lytic chamber 6320. As shown, the middle tapered section 6344 connects the wider diameter upper reservoir 6342 and the smaller diameter capillary tube 6346. In one embodiment, the bottom wall 6350 of the capillary tube 6346 is made of an optically transport material for facilitating optical interrogation of a concentrated microbial agent (not shown) located at the bottom of the capillary tube 6346. In another embodiment, the separation device 6300 is made of an optically transparent material to facilitate optical interrogation of a concentrated microbial agent (not shown) located at the bottom of the capillary tube 6346. As shown, the bottom wall 6350 opposite the capillary tube 6346 may be of a reduced thickness to facilitate optical interrogation as indicated in FIG. 71.

As one of skill in the art would appreciate, the sampling and separation device 6300 of this embodiment operates in a similar manner as the sampling and separation device 6100 of the first embodiment. Accordingly, a detailed description of the operation of this specific embodiment is excluded. After the lysis step has been carried out, the sampling and separation device 6300 of this embodiment can be centrifuged for separation and/or pelleting of any microorganisms contained therein. The sampling and separation device 6300 of this embodiment may be pre-loaded with a lysis buffer and/or a density cushion.

Referring now to FIGS. 73-74, a third embodiment of a combined sampling and separation device 6200 is shown. The combined sampling and separation device 6200 includes an upper housing 6202, a lower housing 6204, and a rotary connection 6206 connecting the upper housing 6202 and lower housing 6204. As shown in FIG. 74, the upper housing encloses an upper lytic chamber 6220, the lower housing encloses a lower separation chamber 6240, and the rotary connection 6206 defines a fluid transfer channel 6230 therethrough. The upper lytic chamber 6220, fluid transfer channel 6230 and lower separation chamber 6240 can be orientated around a central axis 6222, as shown in FIG. 74.

In operation, the rotary connection 6206 can be rotated to an “open” position. In the open position, the fluid flow channel 6230 is opened allowing fluid communication between the upper lytic chamber 6220 and the lower separation chamber 6240 (as shown in FIG. 74). The rotary connection 6206 can also be rotated to a “closed” position to close the fluid flow channel 6230. As shown in FIG. 74, the fluid flow channel comprises an upper opening or channel 6232 through the upper portion of the rotary connection 6208 and a lower opening or channel 6234 through the lower portion of the rotary connection 6210. The rotary connection 6206 of this embodiment may further comprise a sealing gasket 6218 between the upper portion of the rotary connection 6208 and the lower portion of the rotary connection 6210, as shown in FIG. 75, to prevent leaks.

As shown in FIGS. 73-75, the combined sampling and separation device 6200 also comprises a syringe needle 6212 for obtaining a sample from a positive specimen container, and a vacuum port 6214 for pulling a vacuum within the lytic chamber 6220, thereby allowing a sample to be loading into the lytic chamber 6260 of the device 6200. Optionally the syringe may further comprise a sheath (not shown) to protect the syringe needle from damage and/or contamination. The vacuum port 6214 will include a gas permeable filter or hydrophobic membrane 6216 that allows gases to pass but prevents contamination. In operation, the vacuum port 6214 can be connected to a pump (not shown) that can apply a vacuum to the sampling and separation device 6200 for the uptake of a sample from a positive specimen container.

As shown in FIG. 74, the separation chamber 6240 may further comprise an upper reservoir 6242, a middle tapered section 6244 and a lower capillary tube 6246 all arranged around axis 6222 below the lytic chamber 6220. As shown, the middle tapered section 6244 connects the wider diameter upper reservoir 6242 and the smaller diameter capillary tube 6246. In one embodiment, the bottom wall 6250 of the capillary tube 6246 is made of an optically transparent material for facilitating optical interrogation of a concentrated microbial agent (not shown) located at the bottom of the capillary tube 6246. In another embodiment, the separation device 6200 is made of an optically transparent material to facilitate optical interrogation of a concentrated microbial agent (not shown) located at the bottom of the capillary tube 6246. As shown, the bottom wall 6250 opposite the capillary tube 6246 may be of a reduced thickness to facilitate optical interrogation as indicated in FIG. 74.

As one of skill in the art would appreciate, the sampling and separation device 6200 of this embodiment operates in a similar manner as the sampling and separation device 6100 of the first embodiment. Accordingly, a detailed description of the operation of this specific embodiment is excluded. After the lysis step has been carried out, the sampling and separation device 6200 of this embodiment can be centrifuged for separation and/or pelleting of any microorganisms contained therein. The sampling and separation device 6200 of this embodiment may be pre-loaded with a lysis buffer and/or a density cushion.

Referring now to FIGS. 76-78B, another embodiment of a combined sampling and separation device 6400 is shown. The combined sampling and separation device 6400 includes an upper housing 6402, a lower housing 6404, and a rotary valve 6406 connecting the upper housing 6402 and lower housing 6404. As shown in FIGS. 77B and 78B, the upper housing encloses an upper lytic chamber 6420, the lower housing encloses a lower separation chamber 6440, and the rotary valve 6306 defines a fluid transfer channel 6430 therethrough. The upper lytic chamber 6420, fluid transfer channel 6430 and lower separation chamber 6440 can be orientated around a central axis 6422, as shown in FIGS. 77B and 78B.

In operation, the rotary valve 6406 can be rotated via a valve handle 6408 to an “open” position 6434 (see FIG. 78B). In the open position, the fluid flow channel 6430 is opened allowing fluid communication between the upper lytic chamber 6420 and the lower separation chamber 6440 (as shown in FIG. 78B). The rotary valve 6406 can also be rotated to a “closed” position 6434 (see FIG. 77B) to close the fluid flow channel 6430.

As shown in FIGS. 76-78B, the combined sampling and separation device 6400 also comprises a syringe needle 6412 for obtaining a sample from a positive specimen container, and a vacuum port 6414 for pulling a vacuum within the lytic chamber 6420, thereby allowing a sample to be loading into the lytic chamber 6460 of the device 6400. Optionally the syringe may further comprise a sheath (not shown) to protect the syringe needle from damage and/or contamination. The vacuum port 6414 will include a gas permeable filter or hydrophobic membrane 6416 that allows gases to pass but prevents contamination. In operation, the vacuum port 6414 can be connected to a pump (not shown) that can apply a vacuum to the sampling and separation device 6400 for the uptake of a sample from a positive specimen container.

As shown in FIGS. 77B and 78B, the separation chamber 6440 may further comprise an upper reservoir 6442, a middle tapered section 6444 and a lower capillary tube 6446 all arranged around axis 6422 below the lytic chamber 6420. As shown, the middle tapered section 6444 connects the wider diameter upper reservoir 6442 and the smaller diameter capillary tube 6446. In one embodiment, the bottom wall 6450 of the capillary tube 6446 is made of an optically transparent material for facilitating optical interrogation of a concentrated microbial agent (not shown) located at the bottom of the capillary tube 6446. In another embodiment, the separation device 6400 is made of an optically transparent material to facilitate optical interrogation of a concentrated microbial agent (not shown) located at the bottom of the capillary tube 6446. As shown, the bottom wall 6450 opposite the capillary tube 6446 may be of a reduced thickness to facilitate optical interrogation as indicated in FIGS. 77B and 78B.

As one of skill in the art would appreciate, the sampling and separation device 6400 of this embodiment operates in a similar manner as the sampling and separation device 6100 of the first embodiment. Accordingly, a detailed description of the operation of this specific embodiment is excluded. After the lysis step has been carried out, the sampling and separation device 6400 of this embodiment can be centrifuged for separation and/or pelleting of any microorganisms contained therein. The sampling and separation device 6400 of this embodiment may be pre-loaded with a lysis buffer and/or a density cushion.

T. Further Advantages and Features

A number of further advantages and features are obtained by the systems and methods described herein:

1. The system detects the growth of microorganisms and facilitates sampling of a container once adequate microbial growth occurs so the microorganisms can be isolated, purified and characterized from blood (or other sample) and prepared for use in and tested in an ID, AST, molecular or other system.

2. The system can provide for:

-   -   Automated loading and unloading     -   Automated incubation     -   Automated agitation of culture specimen containers to accelerate         antibiotic neutralization     -   Automated detection system for improved time to detection,     -   Sampling of the positive detection container at the time of         detection and automatically prepare a purified sample and         present the sample to an optical interrogation unit.     -   Optional second detection technology for characterization of the         purified sample,     -   Automated calibration of optical detection system     -   Automated waste disposal system

3. Automated clinical Gram, species-level identification antibiotic resistance marker and/or characterization within 15 min of positive bottle detection, with attendant significant clinical benefits

4. Characterization and/or identification testing only performed on positive specimen containers.

5. More reliable characterization result (immediate sample during growth acceleration phase)

6. Characterization during exponential phase cultures is possible, as is characterization during a stationary or stable phase.

7. Rapid Blood Culture Possibilities:

-   -   Opportunity/benefits for multiple samples of same bottle.     -   Incubate 4-8 hrs and then sample (stat mode)     -   Septicemia and/or screening negative specimen containers

8. Major workflow improvement

-   -   automate Gram result for blood cultures.     -   automated identification and/or characterization     -   possible to provide purified sample for AST or molecular testing

9. Supply of disposables to the identification and/or characterization instrument in a cartridge for easy loading

10. Added disposable cost is only incurred for positive specimen containers (where there is clinical value)

11. Potential to save cost for negative samples via sensorless bottle.

12. Only one system for characterization and identification.

13. Low complexity blood culture detection system.

14. The identification and/or characterization system could be configured as an external, separate system but the advantage of being able to immediately sample positive specimen containers would be lost. Hence, the preferred embodiments couple the identification and/or characterization instrument to the detection instrument to enable automated transfer of positive specimen containers. The system can operate 24/7 with little or no human involvement.

15. Potential for complete characterization at time of detection (intrinsic fluorescence spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, mass spectroscopy or other technology)

16. Simplified manufacturing process for culture bottle.

17. A combined CO₂ or other sensor could be included for:

-   -   Compatibility with previous systems,     -   Contamination detection during manufacturing, transport or         storage,     -   Accommodate delayed entry of specimen containers into a         incubation/reading system.

18. A memory device (such as RFID) could be included with the system to store:

-   -   Data from an initial read of the bottle at time of sample         collection (including time),     -   Information from a test (could be used for post         characterization),     -   Manufacturing information (lot, date, expiration, initial         readings, etc),     -   Patient and sample information at time acquired at the time of         collecting the sample:

19. Conveyer input/output facilitating automation and high capacity installations.

20. Automated loading/unloading (via robot transfer mechanism or conveyor).

21. Design of the detection instrument without drawers improves internal system thermal stability by not exposing the incubator area to ambient air.

22. Automatic moving of specimen containers from one position to another or from one rack to another if a rack fails (fault tolerance).

23. Video camera with image analysis on the robot transfer mechanism in either the detection instrument and/or the identification/characterization instrument to aid in:

-   -   location of specimen containers/disposables,     -   recovering from error conditions,     -   detecting spills,     -   for troubleshooting (field service can connect to the camera for         remote diagnosis & repair).

24. Expandability:

-   -   a) Internal capacity/functionality by adding racks/modules.     -   b) External by adding other instruments

25. Measuring volume of blood present in the detection container

-   -   a) by weight or optically     -   b) or acoustically     -   c) or ultrasound scanning     -   d) or other method.

26. Automation promotes “Load and Go” operation of the system. Once the specimen containers are supplied to an input conveyer or robotic transfer mechanism, the rest of the operation is automated and the operator can attend to other tasks.

27. Presenting the bottle at input or output to a fixed point in space for, interface to another system.

28. Automated preplanning before loading and rejecting error specimen containers to a return station.

29. Verifying authentication of a product to ensure counterfeit specimen containers are not being used.

-   -   using a specific authentication method     -   using the internal camera to look for manufacturer logo, label         features, etc.

30. Password protection for access to positive specimen containers.

31. Automated dispensing of negatives into bottle waste.

32. Safety:

-   -   a) Elimination of sharps exposure for venting and sampling         specimen containers     -   b) Reduction in laboratory personnel to biohazardous materials     -   c) Manual/Automated decontamination of disposables and/or system     -   d) Automated decontamination of stoppers prior to sampling     -   e) Automated venting of specimen containers to eliminate         exposure to risk to laboratory personnel handling specimen         containers that have high internal pressure due to gas producing         organisms.

Presently preferred and alternative embodiments of the invention have been described with particularity. However, persons skilled in the art will understand that variation from the details of the disclosed embodiments may be made. All questions concerning the scope of the invention are to be answered by reference to the appended claims. 

1. A method of testing a specimen sample contained within a sealed specimen container, comprising the steps of: a) removing a test sample from the specimen container with a disposable sampling device and containing the test sample in the disposable sampling device; b) lysing non-microbial agent components of the test sample within the disposable sampling device, thereby producing a lysed sample; c) delivering the lysed sample to a disposable separation device; d) concentrating a microbial agent present in the portion of the sample within the disposable separation device; and e) interrogating the concentrated microbial agent within the disposable separation device.
 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of subsequently repeating steps a)-e) on the sample within the sealed specimen container.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the lysing step b) comprises the step of mixing the test sample contained within the disposable sampling device with a selective lytic agent pre-loaded into the disposable sampling device.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the lysing step b) comprises the step of mixing the test sample contained within the disposable sampling device with a selective lytic agent loaded into the disposable sampling device within an instrument automatically implementing steps a)-e).
 5. The method of claim 3, wherein the mixing step is performed with the aid of a vortexer machine holding the disposable sampling device.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the specimen container comprises a blood culture bottle and wherein the specimen sample comprises a blood sample.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the disposable sampling device comprises a syringe having a needle and a chamber connected to the needle.
 8. The method of claim 7, wherein step c) comprises the step of injecting the sample into the disposable separation device with the aid of pneumatic system to force the sample from the chamber through the needle into the disposable separation device.
 9. The method of claim 7, wherein the needle of the disposable sampling device is sheathed with a resilient sheath during the performance of step a) and step c) of claim
 1. 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of venting the specimen container to atmosphere with the aid of the disposable sampling device.
 11. A method of identifying and/or characterizing an unknown microbial agent present in a specimen sample, comprising the steps of a) automatically with robotic apparatus placing the sample within a disposable separation device; b) centrifuging the disposable separation device thereby separating and concentrating the microbial agent within the disposable separation device; c) spectroscopically interrogating the microbial agent to obtain spectroscopic measurements of the concentrated microbial agent; d) comparing the spectroscopic measurements with reference data comprising spectroscopic measurements of concentrated, known microbial agents, and e) identifying and/or characterizing the unknown microbial agent from the comparing step.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the spectroscopic measurements of the microbial agent are performed using intrinsic fluorescence spectroscopy.
 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the disposable separation device is loaded with a density cushion prior to the centrifuging step.
 14. The method of claim 11, wherein the spectroscopic measurements are obtained from the concentrated microbial agent while contained within the disposable separation device.
 15. The method of claim 11, further comprising the step of removing the concentrated microbial agent from the disposable separation device and performing a further analytical test on the concentrated microbial agent.
 16. The method of claim 11, wherein the sample comprises a biological sample.
 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the sample comprises a blood sample.
 18. A method of identifying and/or characterizing a microbial agent in a sample, comprising the steps of: a) obtaining reference data comprising intrinsic fluorescence measurements from concentrations of a multitude of known microbial agents; b) storing the reference data in a machine readable memory accessible to an automated identification and/or characterization instrument; c) providing in the instrument (1) a robotic, automated apparatus concentrating a sample containing an unknown microbial agent within a disposable device, (2) a reading unit capable of obtaining intrinsic fluorescence measurements from the concentrated microbial agent in the disposable device, and (3) a processing unit executing instructions comparing the intrinsic fluorescence measurements obtained from the sample with the reference data and automatically identifying and/or characterizing the unknown microbial agent in the sample.
 19. The method of claim 18, further comprising the steps of: d) obtaining second reference data comprising Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) measurements from concentrations of a multitude of known microbial agents; e) storing the second reference data in the machine readable memory; f) including in the reading unit apparatus for performing SERS measurements on the sample; and g) the processing unit executing further instructions comparing the SERS measurements with the second reference data.
 20. The method of claim 18, wherein the robotic apparatus includes a sample removal apparatus operative to automatically remove the sample from a specimen container with the aid of a disposable sampling device and lyse the sample within the disposable sampling device.
 21. The method of claim 18, wherein the sample comprises a biological sample.
 22. The method of claim 21, wherein the biological sample comprises a blood sample.
 23. The method of claim 22, wherein the instrument comprises an automated instrument for identifying and/or characterizing a microbial agent in a blood sample stored in a specimen container.
 24. The method of claim 18, wherein the instrument further comprises a centrifuge concentrating the microbial agent within the disposable device.
 25. A method for concentrating a microbial agent present in a sample, the sample loaded into a specimen container, comprising performing the steps of: (a) automatically withdrawing a portion of the sample from the specimen container into a disposable sampling device; (b) automatically introducing the portion of the sample from the disposable sampling device into a disposable separation device, the separation device loaded with a density cushion; and (c) automatically centrifuging the disposable separation device to thereby separate and concentrate the microbial agent within the separation device.
 26. The method of claim 25, further comprising the step of lysing cellular components present in the sample prior to performing the automatic centrifuging step (c).
 27. The method of claim 26, wherein the lysing step is performed within the disposable sampling device.
 28. The method of claim 26, wherein the lysing step comprises the step of mixing the sample with a selective lytic buffer within the sampling device.
 29. The method of claim 25, wherein the method further comprises the steps of 1) automatically adding a selective lytic buffer into the disposable sampling device; 2) automatically withdrawing a portion of the sample from the specimen container into the disposable sampling device containing the selective lytic buffer, and 3) mixing the selective lytic buffer with the sample within the disposable sampling device.
 30. The method of claim 25, wherein the steps a), b) and c) are performed automatically more than once on the sample contained within the specimen container.
 31. The method of claim 25, further comprising the step of incubating the specimen container prior to and during the performance of steps a), b) and c).
 32. The method of claim
 26. wherein the sample comprises a blood sample and wherein the specimen container comprises a blood collection bottle. 